Would this team go out and get the top DT, RB or LB on the free agent market if we had a QB on a rookie deal or even between 20-30 mil a year? Probably not.
I'm not on the Dak bandwagon, but the best bet is probably extending Dak and shoring up the run offense AND defense.
Why not re-sign Dak . . . that's a good question -- possibly a good one for Jerry and Stephen to answer. So far, what Jerry has indicated, it seems because he's finally become disgusted with the amounts of money he's overspending on Dak (and his teammates) to win more in the playoffs and perhaps even a SB, as well. Jerry is nearing the end of the line for himself and getting desperate to solidify his legacy.
Of course, that's to say the FO might be eventually inclined to extend Dak long enough to either win more, or otherwise, acquire a QB to replace him for less money and secure more "bang for the bucks." It's ever so much about the dough-re-mi.
Apparently, that's just how this FO and its management rolls.