If we go 9-8 to end the season with Rush, should there be a QB controversy?

[BoysForLife]

Rush isn't good.

Well that explains why there didn't appear to be a huge drop off when Dak got injured

 

[BoysForLife]

how many Dak jersey's sell vs. how many rush jerseys.....

You know at face value this is a laughable comment, but seriously Jerry probably does consider this stuff when building a team.

" how many jerseys can I sell with this player?" No wonder this team is such a mess thanks to our wonderful GM

 

[Chocolate Lab]

Pretty sure after tonight we won't have to worry about these threads anymore.

 

[Coogiguy03]

If this team ends up finishing 9-8 to end the regular season, should there be a QB controversy? It would be something to behold to see Cooper Rush bringing us to a 9-8 record after a dismal 3-5 start. You almost have to consider benching Dak at that point. What say you Cowboys?!

As true as this should be that there should be one, there's something called 60 million!!

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

The only QB controversy in Dallas is we don’t have one. If we ever win another SB with the Jones clan, it won’t be with any QB currently on the roster. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.

As of now I'm keeping Rush at #2 or #3.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Pretty sure after tonight we won't have to worry about these threads anymore.

Getting beat by Joe Burrow? You expected something else? Not even sure we win with Dak...so...now what?

 

[Chocolate Lab]

Getting beat by Joe Burrow? You expected something else?

No, I didn't.

 

[Coogiguy03]

They’d have to sign Rush to a contract first. No contract, no controversy.

Stupidly we'd pay a backup such as rush 10 million a year when we already have a QB, instead of just drafting one or getting someone else low key (vet)

 

[morat1959]

As of now I'm keeping Rush at #2 or #3.

Just like Dak, he’s a capable backup.

 

[Coogiguy03]

Rush isn't good.

neither is the 60 million dollar guy

 

[rambo2]

neither is the 60 million dollar guy

He could be.

 

[Bagman]

Its funny how nobody has a problem replacing a CB or TE or OL who is underperforming but for some reason hesitate to replace the QB. I get it. The owner/GM is insane. He runs the team like a board game played in his mansion. But the reasoning should be the same. Play the players who's performance results in team victories. If this team can be 9-8 without spending $60 million at the QB position, there should be serious thought to clearing that bloated salary.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

No, I didn't.

We shall see right? Defense has harass Joe pretty hard. Coop has to put up some points and control clock. Not expecting it but it's possible.

 

[Coogiguy03]

Its funny how nobody has a problem replacing a CB or TE or OL who is underperforming but for some reason hesitate to replace the QB. I get it. The owner/GM is insane. He runs the team like a board game played in his mansion. But the reasoning should be the same. Play the players who's performance results in team victories. If this team can be 9-8 without spending $60 million at the QB position, there should be serious thought to clearing that bloated salary.

problem is we actually WANTED to give Dak the big deal it's clearly obvious they wanted to do this, we should have waited I'm sorry.

 

[morat1959]

He could be.

Please be honest…how many jerseys and other Dak related items do you own?

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Well that explains why there didn't appear to be a huge drop off when Dak got injured

 

[KJJ]

Some bozos here are already trying to create a controversy. They claim Rush is better and the team looks better with him. If the Cowboys win tonight one of them will respond to this post with a wise crack. Book it! lol

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

He could be.

How so?

Year 9 is THE breakout year?

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Some bozos here are already trying to create a controversy. They claim Rush is better and the team looks better with him. If the Cowboys win tonight one of them will respond to this post with a wise crack. Book it! lol

So you don't think the team LOOKS different? If not..fine. If so...there should be a few reasons for it.

Different personnel? Injury reprieve? An offensive scheme that HAS to be inherently different with a back up QB?

 

[rambo2]

How so?

Year 9 is THE breakout year?

The way it could work is with a stud running back and a number 2 receiver added and some oline help added in free agency.