Hostile
The Duke
- Messages
- 119,565
- Reaction score
- 4,544
I think that is what the "so am I" means.popp1234;4157602 said:So Hos, that means you believe in him too, right? Romo, I mean.
I think that is what the "so am I" means.popp1234;4157602 said:So Hos, that means you believe in him too, right? Romo, I mean.
Fat Toad;4157616 said:Didn't Tom Brady throw four picks and choke away a 17 pt lead just last week?
Chappy;4157634 said:Also tell me that last time Brady dropped consecutive games??
Romo is not fit to tie Brady's shoe lace.
Poor comparison.
+1 Still behind him. Still believe he will bounce back.Hostile;4157580 said:So am I. Garrett and Ryan too.
Hostile;4157628 said:I think that is what the "so am I" means.
tyke1doe;4157653 said:To me, it's not about believing in him or not. He's the Cowboys quarterback, and they aren't making a change.
So why get all upset about it? I don't have any power to change it.
I blame Garrett more because he's supposed to protect his quarterback via his play-calling, especially if he has shown a propensity to make bonehead turnovers when we're leading or trying to close out a game.
You call running plays, call safe pass plays, then punt the ball and rely on your defense.
Unless we're going to replace Romo, and we're not, then Garrett has to do a better job of taking the game out of Tony Romo's hands when we get a lead, and a comfortable lead. I mean how many more times do we have to see him choke a game away before we're convinced he needs to be better managed?
BlueStar22;4157618 said:Good for you...good luck with that.
JonJon;4157663 said:I'm behind the Cowboys. Not individuals. I root for them as Cowboys, but if they are detrimental to the Cowboys success, then those individuals must go.
ChopBlock;4157666 said:Romo may be a tough SOB, but he's still an SOB. I'll never question his toughness, but he's not a winner.
tyke1doe;4157653 said:To me, it's not about believing in him or not. He's the Cowboys quarterback, and they aren't making a change.
So why get all upset about it? I don't have any power to change it.
I blame Garrett more because he's supposed to protect his quarterback via his play-calling, especially if he has shown a propensity to make bonehead turnovers when we're leading or trying to close out a game.
You call running plays, call safe pass plays, then punt the ball and rely on your defense.
Unless we're going to replace Romo, and we're not, then Garrett has to do a better job of taking the game out of Tony Romo's hands when we get a lead, and a comfortable lead. I mean how many more times do we have to see him choke a game away before we're convinced he needs to be better managed?
Nav22;4157680 said:And yet he's won 41 of his 65 starts.