one word........kicker.TSquare said:My other point is that this is a playoff caliber team, and if not for a few bad breaks and an injury or two, it would be solidly in the playoffs right now. Probably not so with a rookie QB in there. If the Cowboys don't make it, hindsight is 20/20, I guess. I also believe this team is positioned to be solidly in the playoffs next year if they make a couple good moves in the offseason. I believe the team BP had envisioned was the one we saw last week, with JJ running for 194 and a solid performance from the passing game. Add some depth at OL, and it looks really good.
That too! Damn. I always forget about those little buggers.big dog cowboy said:one word........kicker.
TwoDeep3 said:I am in favor of grooming a young quarterback.
I believe we tried that with Quincy.
He failed.
Romo brings nothing to the table for me. Short and weak armed, this is Clint Stoerner 2, in my opinion.
In football, you take the starting job by performance. Not because you looked good when you were a collegiate player five years ago.
I am not sold on Henson as I was.
Fact is, I think this guy is eating salary for no reason. If he was as talented as some seem to make out in this thread, then why is he #3? Because he isn't absorbing the offense, or cannot function at this level.
If it was me, and Brady Quinn came out, I would do whatever it took to move up to get this guy. Provided we have the ammo to do so. That might require next year's first.
He could work toward being a starter as Bledsoe finishes his career.
But this idea that Henson somehow has the talent and the old man is ignoring it because of some ego thing is ridiculous.
It has been my experience watching this game for more years than I wish to admit that coaches tend to play the best players and not sit them.
And exactly how well would this and any other board have taken another 4-12 season with Henson under center. Just the games we lost this season caused a firestorm of people calling for Parcell's head.
Henson is a wasted pick. The sooner we accept this and move on, the better this team will be.
rcaldw said:The simplest way for me to answer this is to simply acknowledge that we completely disagree about coaches sometimes having it in for a player. In fact, sometimes it isn't even the coach, it is the owner. Would that happen in the NFL?
I don't know, ask Marcus Allen about Al Davis. That was purely a matter of Allen not having talent when he was rotting away on a Raiders sideline, wasn't it?
I DO believe that Parcells has a problem with Henson, and I don't think its all about talent either.
Waffle said:If it isn't all about talent,then what is it?
rcaldw said:What was it with Marcus Allen?
Waffle said:With all due respect, who cares about Marcus Allen? I was asking about BP and this supposed "problem" he has with Henson? What is it????
It was one isolated incident that happened a decade ago, and we were dealing with AL DAVIS on that one...not Parcells.
Can you give me an incident where Parcells had it in for a player? I can't.
rcaldw said:With all due respect, I don't give a tator chip for Bill Parcells, I will be glad the day he is gone. I'm sitting here right now having to root for another team to lose so that my team can get into the playoffs. And if they do lose, I will get to watch another mid 30's to 40 year old QB's lead our team. That is thanks to the Bill Parcell's mindset. So if others want to think that Big Bill doesn't have favorites, go ahead, I think he does, and lets just leave it at that. I've stated my opinion, which effects nothing in real Cowboys land anyway, and in the mean time I'll just have to wait until Parcells retires to see another young QB at the helm. here is one guy hoping its after this season.
Waffle said:If you are going to complain about having to root for another team, you would have a stronger argument if you blamed Parcells for letting Hoffman go. Or how about a couple of last minute defensive collapses that led to losses?
I think it's clear you don't like Parcells and that's fine. But you failed to answer my question or the question from the other poster that wanted to know what exactly you've seen in Henson to think that having him at QB would have changed things?
rcaldw said:I have answered that question Waff. In the brief moments I've actually seen Henson on the field, I have liked what I saw of him. I DON'T think he would have changed our fortunes this year. I think we could have developed him these two years and at least if we were sitting outside the playoffs looking in, it would be with a young developing Qb and not another blast from Bill's past.
In terms of Hoffman, I have already posted here that whoever fired Hoffman should be fired himself. hmmmmm, I wonder who didn't want to retain him?
Waffle said:I've personally liked what I've seen from Romo in the brief moment's I've seen him on the field, but I'm not calling for him to be the starter simply because he's young.
Look, I was anti-Bledsoe when we signed him. But now, he is CLEARLY the better QB for our team right now. The guy is only 33, not 42 like Vinny.
Maybe Henson should try and get better and beat out Romo first. That would be a good start for him.