Interesting comment from Ware

[SkinsandTerps]

Ware was in coverage alot Sunday if you watch the video. They still played the 3-4 more than what I would've liked.

He's right about having a huge NT to play that position, but when I mentioned last year that Ferguson was too light, people ripped me a part, so I've shut my face about it. If the boys want to run a 3-4, they'd better get another Ware, and a huge NT, and a DC who knows how to run it, and a coach who will let the Coordinator do what he needs to do.

I am not the know all end all by any means, nor do I claim to be.

Ware is susceptible in coverage at times. Not that he sucks, just that he isnt always clutch.

I was right there with you talking about the need for a big, solid NT. The Cowboys just never brought in a guy to fill that void so they must have accepted what they had.

 

[Clove]

I am not the know all end all by any means, nor do I claim to be.

Ware is susceptible in coverage at times. Not that he sucks, just that he isnt always clutch.

I was right there with you talking about the need for a big, solid NT. The Cowboys just never brought in a guy to fill that void so they must have accepted what they had.

Had Parcells started the process 4 years ago instead of 2 years ago, we'd be in perfect condition.

 

[Aikbach]

I am not the know all end all by any means, nor do I claim to be.

Ware is susceptible in coverage at times. Not that he sucks, just that he isnt always clutch.

I was right there with you talking about the need for a big, solid NT. The Cowboys just never brought in a guy to fill that void so they must have accepted what they had.

You're right, he'll never be as good as those Commander linebackers such as....uh...um....Lavar Arrington? *sigh*

 

[SkinsandTerps]

You're right, he'll never be as good as those Commander linebackers such as....uh...um....Lavar Arrington? *sigh*

He plays for the Commanders ?

Maybe I missed a meeting ?

 

[Aikbach]

He plays for the Commanders ?

Maybe I missed a meeting ?

Formerly he did, that was how far back I had to dig to find a respectable..er..I mean hyped Commander linebacker.

 

[SkinsandTerps]

Formerly he did, that was how far back I had to dig to find a respectable..er..I mean hyped Commander linebacker.

So you thought the guy that essentially ended Aikman's career respectable ?

I would have rather you said Marcus Washington or even Antonio Pierce (current Giant).

Based on what I would like to know ? Please and Thanks.

 

[Aikbach]

So you thought the guy that essentially ended Aikman's career respectable ?

I would have rather you said Marcus Washington or even Antonio Pierce (current Giant).

Based on what I would like to know ? Please and Thanks.

Forgive me I should have used the adjectives hyped, overpaid, inept, Daniel Snyder.

 

[theogt]

So you thought the guy that essentially ended Aikman's career respectable ?

I would have rather you said Marcus Washington or even Antonio Pierce (current Giant).

Based on what I would like to know ? Please and Thanks.

I was about to say the same thing (i.e., I would rather have Washington over Lavar).

 

[Aikbach]

I was about to say the same thing (i.e., I would rather have Washington over Lavar).

I never implied i wanted any of them, this was a fiction created by the skin fan above.

 

[SkinsandTerps]

Forgive me I should have used the adjectives hyped, overpaid, inept, Daniel Snyder.

Adjectives placed where exactly ?

I will give you the chance to re-post and adjust your previous post. So then maybe; since I am just a Commanders fan... maybe, I will get a clearer understanding of your skewed perception.

 

[theogt]

I never implied i wanted any of them, this was a fiction created by the skin fan above.

I know...I was just saying.

 

[hendog]

OT, I know. But I read that last night and wonder how much of it is posturing vs. reality.

I have met Key a couple of times and he isnt one to mince words.

Problem isnt Henning so much as Jake and that piss poor offensive line.

At least I was right about how bad/overrated the Panthers would be this season.

I bet you weren't right about you're prediction for the skins. They're the overrated ones.

 

[SkinsandTerps]

I bet you weren't right about you're prediction for the skins. They're the overrated ones.

Oh wow, you are a genius.

I said I was right about the Panthers clearly.

I will admit also clearly that I certainly didnt think the Commanders would fare as poorly as they did. And you can look it up if you want.

 

[kmd24]

In all fairness the Cowboys dont have the personnel to execute a dominant 3-4.

They need a dominant NT ( Wilfork for example) , DE's who get pressure on the edges (but have enough size to control the line still) , LBs who are small enough to cover and strong/fast enough to support run. And basically leave Roy to do what he does best most of the time. A solid coverage FS, and Cowboys are okay as far as CBs go the problems with the secondary start up front.

But hey... thats just my opinion, and remember I am a Commanders fan.

Most of what you wrote is correct, but the part about LB's isn't. 3-4 LB's need to be big because they are often taking on linemen, particularly the middle LB's.

 

[eduncan22]

In our watered down version of the 3-4, that is probably true.

Right now, it is just him. Before it was either he or Ellis most of the time.

Carp is still finding his way. He had a good game vs. the Lions.

We need this guy to step it up, fast.

 

[Gossamer]

I transcribed this from the Ticket's postgame audio...

You can listen to the audio yourself if you go to the Media Zone and download the MP3 file of the postgame that I put up. Where he talks about the 3-4 vs. 4-3 is at about 48:33.

<Brad Sham>....I'm guessing you like that four man front?

<Ware> Oh, yeah. I like the four man front. You're able to get more pressure on passing situations. You don't have to worry about - in the 3-4 - only one guy rushing or trying to figure out what kind of blitz you want to give the offense. I mean we like it alot. We got alot of great pass rushers. I think that it's gonna carry over to next week - some type of scheme that we have. But, um, the players feel good about it.

(I wonder if the coaches feel good about it?)

 

[dbair1967]

Ware said something to the the extent that in the 3-4 you only have ONE player trying to rush the QB. ng2:

honestly in our version it looks liek nobody is rushing the passer

the downside is Zimmer can probably invent a scheme where we drop 11 guys to cover their 5, and still they'd find the wide open areas of the creampuff zones

David