Damnation! The video game could have had me likeness at a nominal cost!They may have a video game by now
Criminal history?.....No record of any transgressions in years, but we are automatically to assume he has done something now all of a sudden?....OkSo far he hasn’t done much of anything except getting moved from a hotel and banned from working the Super Bowl. We can make of judgement of those actions. Especially given his criminal history.
He shouldn't have to. He should be able to be himself. People are nuts and sensitive these days. But sensitive to the wrong things.You gotta bullseye on you, Irv. Going forward - tread carefully.
Such a naive boy or girl you are to not take his um, past actions into account. Employers, judges, D.A.s, sweethearts, insurers, military, analytics take criminal history into account.Criminal history?.....No record of any transgressions in years, but we are automatically to assume he has done something now all of a sudden?....Ok
In U.S. courts....previous crimes and MO's can be stricken. Might be considered "soft"...but it's true.Such a naive boy or girl you are to not take his um, past actions into account. Employers, judges, D.A.s, sweethearts, insurers, military, analytics take criminal history into account.
But not you, Mr. Blinded By the Light.
You are a soft boy I can tell. Try harder, govnor.
Be best!
First of all you can keep your BS soft boy comments to yourself. And no, I'm not naive or blinded by any light. I'm saying to those here prosecuting this man, or anyone else without facts may want to at least wait until the investigation is completed......Such a naive boy or girl you are to not take his um, past actions into account. Employers, judges, D.A.s, sweethearts, insurers take criminal history into account.
But not you, Mr. Blinded By the Light.
You are a soft boy I can tell.
Be best!
Back in the day...a comment (or even some gestures) considered inappropriate could be met with a slap in the face and everyone moves on.He shouldn't have to. He should be able to be himself. People are nuts and sensitive these days. But sensitive to the wrong things.
Are you not familiar with his altercation in recent years that got him fired at ESPN ?Criminal history?.....No record of any transgressions in years, but we are automatically to assume he has done something now all of a sudden?....Ok
Yes I am, which was not so recent but 13 years ago. Yet I see him back on ESPN weekly.Are you not familiar with his altercation in recent years that got him fired at ESPN ?
Tha, old fellow, was directed at VabscharkIn U.S. courts....previous crimes and MO's can be stricken. Might be considered "soft"...but it's true.
Disregard the post.No....where do you get that idea? Man I get benched quite often. Trying to NOT...if I can help it.
The guy made a false accusation and I explained.
Meanwhile...you are telling me how to post. LOL...hypocrite much?
Coming at me all wrong mate.
Isn't Irvin married?
yeah you can tell who wasn't around in the 90's by them being somewhat surprisedHe’s had plenty history of misconduct and why ESPN let him go.
Disregarded!Disregard the post.
It was the drank talking.
Or. "Believe women."Doesn't make it right or fair. TYotal CYA move, like most big corps do. "just in case". "Err on the side of the accuser".
Just in case.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son.Disregard the post.
It was the drank talking.