Irvin pulled from Super Bowl coverage

[shabazz]

she was drunk as well btw. It was a BAR. Classic he said she said maybe.

True….. but remember the phrase during a certain confirmation, “She Must be Believed”


unless the allegation are against certain people

 

[Captain-Crash]

good, good, get him off tv.

 

[Cowpolk]

Disagreeing with people doesn't make them not fans.

I got that word in our 6th grade spelling bee in 1965 got it right and came in 2nd place

 

[Starforever]

I see why this situation occurred; they knew he would be unbearable this Monday morning.

 

[Rockport]

All you jokers who said he was guilty because of what you saw on the internet, you suck!!

 

[speedkilz88]

The accuser is a hotel employee?

The witnesses even said that they thought she was part of the bar or restaurant and that she approached Mike as he was headed to the elevator.

 

[CouchCoach]

All you jokers who said he was guilty because of what you saw on the internet, you suck!!

LMAO, guilty of what? No one knows what he supposedly did.

 

[Diehardblues]

All you jokers who said he was guilty because of what you saw on the internet, you suck!!

He doesn’t have to be guilty of anything.

But his actions or conduct was enough to alarm the hotel to move him and the NFL to not allow him to cover the SB.

With Irvin’s history I tend to lean towards the leagues and networks actions.

 

[Diehardblues]

LMAO, guilty of what? No one knows what he supposedly did.

Right. But we know what action the hotel and NFL took.

That’s all there is to discuss. They saw the video and heard her complaint .

We are all left to only speculate on what could have happened . Nothing criminal didn’t sound like . With Irvin’s history doesn’t take much to alarm those involved.

 

[Rockport]

He doesn’t have to be guilty of anything.

But his actions or conduct was enough to alarm the hotel to move him and the NFL to not allow him to cover the SB.

With Irvin’s history I tend to lean towards the leagues and networks actions.

You’re one of the jokers who are saying he’s guilty without even knowing the truth which now shows he was innocent of any wrongdoing. Haven’t you seen the video or heard of all the eyewitnesses who back Irvin’s side? Don’t be lazy and do your research before looking so dumb.

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

she was drunk as well btw. It was a BAR. Classic he said she said maybe.

Where was that reported?

 

[Diehardblues]

You’re one of the jokers who are saying he’s guilty without even knowing the truth which now shows he was innocent of any wrongdoing. Haven’t you seen the video or heard of all the eyewitnesses who back Irvin’s side? Don’t be lazy and do your research before looking so dumb.

Guilty of what. Can’t you frikin read . Lol

 

[Rockport]

Guilty of what. Can’t you frikin read . Lol

Inappropriate behavior. Can’t you fricken read?

 

[Diehardblues]

LMAO, guilty of what? No one knows what he supposedly did.

Right. @Rockport

No one has said he’s guilty of anything . No charges have been made . Potential Inappropriate behavior isn’t illegal .

But it could be enough to be removed from a hotel and your job . Especially with his history. Apparently the NFL Network thought so.

 

[Rockport]

Right. @Rockport

No one has said he’s guilty of anything . No charges have been made . Potential Inappropriate behavior isn’t illegal .

But it could be enough to be removed from a hotel and your job . Especially with his history.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...in-accuser-after-alleged-misconduct-incident/

 

[Diehardblues]

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...in-accuser-after-alleged-misconduct-incident/

I’ve seen that . I still stand by the NFL Network decision to remove Irvin even if it was a premature cautionary decision.

 

[Rockport]

I’ve seen that . I still stand by the NFL Network decision to remove Irvin even if it was a premature cautionary decision.

Which means you’re saying he’s guilty until proven innocent.

 

[Diehardblues]

Which means you’re saying he’s guilty until proven innocent.

Not at all. But when you’re in a public company like a Network especially , you have to make Human Resource decisions until you have more information in order to protect the image of the business.

The Marriott or NFL never said he was guilty of anything . They just moved him to another hotel which I sure was still paid for by the Network. And suspended him until further info was available . I’m sure he was still paid while being benched .

When you have a celebrity personality with his history I can definitely see what they would be cautious .

 

[Rockport]

Not at all. But when you’re in a public company like a Network especially , you have to make Human Resource decisions until you have more information in order to protect the image of the business.

The Marriott or NFL never said he was guilty of anything . They just moved him to another hotel which I sure was still paid for by the Network. And suspended him until further info was available . I’m sure he was still paid while being benched .

When you have a celebrity personality with his history I can definitely see what they would be cautious .

Removing him is saying he’s guilty until proven guilty. My God I can’t believe you don’t get that hence the 100 million lawsuit which I hope he wins. And I hope the accuser is punished for false accusations.

 

[Diehardblues]

Removing him is saying he’s guilty until proven guilty. My God I can’t believe you don’t get that hence the 100 million lawsuit which I hope he wins. And I hope the accuser is punished for false accusations.

No it’s not saying he’s guilty. That’s your interpretation . HR often has to suspend personnel until an investigation is done .

And the lawsuit is just a retaliation on his part to clear his name . Which I don’t blame him. The process will play out.