Irvin to have 7am Wed press conference - Video in post 113

[CouchCoach]

So you think an employee's handbook takes precedence over a judge's court order. My goodness. That says everything I need to know.

No, not precedence with the court but Marriott would want their lawyers dragging their feet on this for their employees.

 

[Merlin]

Merlin... lets you and me go have a drink....lol

Man, I need a drink after reading some of these crazy comments. You will never change their mind. The woman could confess she was lying, they would have a crazy excuse to explain it. Smh

 

[Miller]

You are nuts if you dont think those witnesses will be asked the questions I stated above. Irvin stated he meets people all day everyday and he cant tell you what they all talked about. You are trying to make it like he was in a drunken stuper.... of which witnesses would be able to testify to that as well as the video showing him walking would show that. You just keep wanting to go back to Mike answering some questions to some reporter like that is what will have more weight than the other stuff. Regardless.. I dont care what Mike said... NOTHING he could have SAID (as in WORDS) should cost any many their career. He didnt work with her, he isnt her boss..... they mean nothing to each other.

Let me ask you this.... if you went up to some person, any person at a bar and made some vulgar comment to them, could be sexual, could be non sexual, but vulgar. Do you think they would be able to sue you for damages and win?

You are a fan boy and clueless! She didn’t sue him for anything. She complained and he was pulled from SB coverage and moved ftom the hotel Also being vulgar isn’t protected. Lol

Also for all of you complaining about the video,,,the news just stated they hotel had been working with the judge to keep the privacy of the party and others in the video private. Wow! Who said that earlier today? Also said Irvin was invited to watch the video but decilined as his attorney watched

 

[Diehardblues]

He literally said he couldn’t remember BECAUSE he had a few drinks. But you’re going to quote his lawyer say he only had water and think that’s even 1% believable. that’s some funny ish there…

What he actually said was he’d been out drinking all night .

 

[Reid1boys]

He literally said he couldn’t remember BECAUSE he had a few drinks. But you’re going to quote his lawyer say he only had water and think that’s even 1% believable. that’s some funny ish there…

once again... you are so jacked up about facts. 1 I NEVER once quoted his lawyer.... NOT ONCE!
2, the lawyer didnt say all he drank was water. He said at the time Mike was in the lobby he had a water (when guests offered to buy him a drink). See how you cant get those simple facts straight? and see how much words matter... words that you cant seem to keep straight.

 

[CouchCoach]

I’d have to go back and look at the timeline but seems like the news initially broke with he had been moved from hotel and network sent him home was all in breaking news. And Irvin’s 105.3 interview or call in was in response to being benched .

Listen to it. Irvin said he's hiding out, waiting. Nothing had been done with him when he made that call in on Wednesday morning. A later interview after he was in Dallas was about getting benched.

 

[Reid1boys]

You are a fan boy and clueless! She didn’t sue him for anything. She complained and he was pulled from SB coverage and moved ftom the hotel

Also for all of you complaining about the video,,,the news just stated they hotel had been working with the judge to keep the privacy of the party and others in the video private. Wow! Who said that earlier today? Also said Irvin was invited to watch the video but decilined as his attorney watched

please show me where I said she was suing him? I asked a HYPOTHETICAL question) lol.... ugh... having a conversation with people that dont read what is written is tiring. I got to exit the building for the night. This is too tiring.

 

[Miller]

Man, I need a drink after reading some of these crazy comments. You will never change their mind. The woman could confess she was lying, they would have a crazy excuse to explain it. Smh

I don’t know what happened but you are saying today that the delay in the video was evidence. Tonight the news is reporting Irvin was invited to watch the video and that that they are trying to protect the privacy of those on the video working with with judge. Man I swear an attorney on line said that earlier….mmmm

 

[CouchCoach]

What he actually said was he’d been out drinking all night .

No, "had a few drinks, to tell the truth" is what he said. Tha's not drinking all night.

His lawyer emphasized he was drinking water back at the hotel.

 

[Cowboysheelsreds058]

I’m sleep! Good night

 

[Diehardblues]

Man, I need a drink after reading some of these crazy comments. You will never change their mind. The woman could confess she was lying, they would have a crazy excuse to explain it. Smh

If it’s established the employee has a longer history of lying or false accusations than he does of sexual misconduct then perhaps we have an argument.

 

[Reid1boys]

No, "had a few drinks, to tell the truth" is what he said. Tha's not drinking all night.

His lawyer emphasized he was drinking water back at the hotel.

thank you..... thank you, thank you.
Finally, someone paying attention to the details.

 

[Miller]

please show me where I said she was suing him? I asked a HYPOTHETICAL question) lol.... ugh... having a conversation with people that dont read what is written is tiring. I got to exit the building for the night. This is too tiring.

You literally asked me a question about if a person could sue for a vulgar question. It’s like you are just spinning in circles. Wake up. I have no opinion of guilt. I’m just trying to legally explain your made up theories

 

[Miller]

thank you..... thank you, thank you.
Finally, someone paying attention to the details.

I don’t think you get what he’s saying

 

[Diehardblues]

No, "had a few drinks, to tell the truth" is what he said. Tha's not drinking all night.

His lawyer emphasized he was drinking water back at the hotel.

Yea. Just said he’d been out drinking. Not all night .

I had to go back and look at 105.3 interview. Interesting how all of the narratives after said how troubling his words and admittance were.

 

[Merlin]

I don’t know what happened but you are saying today that the delay in the video was evidence. Tonight the news is reporting Irvin was invited to watch the video and that that they are trying to protect the privacy of those on the video working with with judge. Man I swear an attorney on line said that earlier….mmmm

Well you are not the only attorney here. They had plenty of time to do that regardless. More excuses. The media said Irvin was invited so you assume it has to be true. Okay counselor. Smh.

I said the judge ordered them to turn the evidence over. Do you see an order anywhere that changed that?

 

[Miller]

Yea. Just said he’d been out drinking. Not all night .

I had to go back and look at 105.3 interview. Interesting how all of the narratives after said how troubling his words and admittance were.

I’m confused on your position here. His quote was he had been out drinking as an excuse to not remembering what happened. At that time or “all night” has no bearing

 

[Reid1boys]

I don’t think you get what he’s saying

I know exactly what he was saying... you are obviously confused. Coach was being specific about what Irvin said, and those words contradict the spin on those words that diehard was saying.

Coach was someone who actually knew what Irvin said and it in no way could be construed as saying he had been out drinking all night.

 

[Reid1boys]

I’m confused on your position here. His quote was he had been out drinking as an excuse to not remembering what happened. At that time or “all night” has no bearing

wow............

 

[Miller]

Well you are not the only attorney here. They had plenty of time to do that regardless. More excuses. The media said Irvin was invited so you assume it has to be true. Okay counselor. Smh.

I said the judge ordered them to turn the evidence over. Do you see an order anywhere that changed that?

That was my point earlier. I’ve said all along I’m Switzerland and this thread is stupid because sitting on our hands and waiting is the best way to deal with it. You and others said the delay was proof. All o was saying is “we know nothing” because it’s fed through sources and even mentioned negotiations. Thsts it. People are digging heels on made up scenarios