This x 1000. Like Pete Carol once said, "Romo has some magic to him". Dak has no magic.Romo was never the highest paid ever. And was 10x the QB Dak will ever be.
I disagree. I think Dak did have some magic, but it quickly went away, going away entirely when he got that horrific ankle injury.This x 1000. Like Pete Carol once said, "Romo has some magic to him". Dak has no magic.
Apparently the Cowboys coaching and front office didn't think the same.10000%
They are about equal if you ask me.This x 1000. Like Pete Carol once said, "Romo has some magic to him". Dak has no magic.
Isn't the same you doing with Romo?The Dak fans will do or say anything to prop up their guy.
By page 15? Each thread page consists of twenty posts. Let's do a flashback to the number of posts and their responses on a previous page:By page 15, this has devolved into one of the worst threads ever created.
Yeah having that one in the lexicon can get you in trouble these days. Weird.Apparently, meritocracy is a dirty word around here.
Nope,not true. Dak fought for this over the market contract.Dak didn’t deserve the contract but since the owner is an idiot he got it. Dak just signed the paper.
The FO did. Dak agreed to a contract extension early on then renegged. Honestly, how do people not know this? Memory issues?I don't understand the thread....Dak being greedy? Well, first blame the front office. They had a chance to sign Dak for much less early on. They chose to wait to see what the QB market would be by letting others sign for outrageous deals with QBs that, in my opinion hadn't done anything more than Dak. Secondly, if your job offered you what YOU thought you were worth and it was a lot more that what that job title said it was after researching, would you take it? OR, would you say...nooo, the haters say I'm not worth that much so, can you offer me less, please?
Yup. Same guy. Different reasons, but same guy. Both have/had deer in the headlights in the playoffs.They are about equal if you ask me.
You gotta know the thread was posted by a known Dak hater who said the whole team should beat Dak up like Private Pile got beat up in Full Metal Jacket, because of his poor performance. but seriously, by definition it is greedy to take more than you need, if you do so knowingly that it will have a negative impact on others, for example the team. You can blame an idiot, bad poker playing, owner, but that doesn't negate greed. Neither does bringing up any other players, since that is just what-about-ism.I don't understand the thread....Dak being greedy? Well, first blame the front office. They had a chance to sign Dak for much less early on. They chose to wait to see what the QB market would be by letting others sign for outrageous deals with QBs that, in my opinion hadn't done anything more than Dak. Secondly, if your job offered you what YOU thought you were worth and it was a lot more that what that job title said it was after researching, would you take it? OR, would you say...nooo, the haters say I'm not worth that much so, can you offer me less, please?
No ...... he choked in the playoffs also ..... only difference is he did not freeze up like a deer in the headlights in the first half of playoff games.Isn't the same you doing with Romo?
Insisting on short term contracts is the biggest sign of Dak greed. This simply hamstrings the team's ability to make a playoff run, and Dak does not care.You gotta know the thread was posted by a known Dak hater who said the whole team should beat Dak up like Private Pile got beat up in Full Metal Jacket, because of his poor performance. but seriously, by definition it is greedy to take more than you need, if you do so knowingly that it will have a negative impact on others, for example the team. You can blame an idiot, bad poker playing, owner, but that doesn't negate greed. Neither does bringing up any other players, since that is just what-about-ism.
What, Dak GREEDY??? Of course not. That's why he hired Todd France, France is known for guarding against greed! France probably tried to talk the Cowboys out of demanding those ridiculous contracts but the Cowboys just wouldn't hear of it!I don't understand the thread....Dak being greedy? Well, first blame the front office. They had a chance to sign Dak for much less early on. They chose to wait to see what the QB market would be by letting others sign for outrageous deals with QBs that, in my opinion hadn't done anything more than Dak. Secondly, if your job offered you what YOU thought you were worth and it was a lot more that what that job title said it was after researching, would you take it? OR, would you say...nooo, the haters say I'm not worth that much so, can you offer me less, please?
Isn't the same you doing with Romo?
How did he agree and then renegged? And how do you know this for sure? If he signed, there is no reneg. First I've heard of this and I follow all of their news. And though there's some you can't believe, I've never heard he agreed and then renegged.The FO did. Dak agreed to a contract extension early on then renegged. Honestly, how do people not know this? Memory issues?