- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
Fail.
Just so you know.
Just so you know.
ajk23az;3025641 said:I think he's waiting until the 16th game. Then we will show the league what we really got!
We already knew that silly.bbgun;3025793 said:I have a confession to make: I am holding back on thoughtful and intelligent posts.
McCordsville Cowboy;3025699 said:Garrett is a dweeb. Get a OC with some creativity. Not one with that of a tick.
MichaelWinicki;3025712 said:Fail.
Just so you know.
juck;3025652 said:Flozell= drive killing penalties consistently
Romo=chokes,and INTs
What team do u watch?
DandyDon1722;3025637 said:For the amount of hype that the two tight end formation received during camp as compared to the results it's gotten, do you think JG is waiting for the Eagles game (or even later) to show some stuff?
What we know: The running game is exceptional
What hasn't happened:
All the mismatches it was supposed to provide in the passing game.
The explosion of Martellus Bennett.
Regardless of his play calling, Garrett is clever. If he is holding back for late season surprises, he's playing a dangerous game because it might not matter.
TonyRomo#9;3025843 said:the thing is, if he is simplifing things right now, why does he keep abandoning the run? you would think if he wanted to keeps some secrets, and we are running the ball so well, he would just keep running it, until we need said secrets... i don't like seeing our games called like andy reid is here.
Doomsday101;3025847 said:Dallas is running the ball more than we have even under Parcells. Dallas is not going to abandon the pass
TonyRomo#9;3025875 said:im not talking by the numbers on the whole, im talking about in the second halves of games when it has been effective the whole game, and we are still in it, or leading.. the numbers might say we run enough, but anyone watching the games knows garrett doesn't like running when we get into the second half.
juck;3025652 said:Flozell= drive killing penalties consistently
Romo=chokes,and INTs
What team do u watch?
casmith07;3025892 said:I don't know, but I watched a team last week in which Romo threw for over 300 yards with 0 INTs.
TonyRomo#9;3025896 said:please, don't start the "you don't know football like i do arguement"
a persons experiance doesn't effect their ability to deliver a good point, it might effect the frequancy, but i don't have to go to mexico to tell someone not to drink the water..
ive watched the games, especially the denver game, inwhich we had been running the ball very well, barber especially, and he barely touched the ball in the second half.. when it gets to crunch time, garrett just doesn't run it. including on the goal line.
none of us have to have played the game to know garrett shouldn't have had witten blocking when the game was on the line.. refute someones point, not their experiance.
DandyDon1722;3025637 said:For the amount of hype that the two tight end formation received during camp as compared to the results it's gotten, do you think JG is waiting for the Eagles game (or even later) to show some stuff?
What we know: The running game is exceptional
What hasn't happened:
All the mismatches it was supposed to provide in the passing game.
The explosion of Martellus Bennett.
Regardless of his play calling, Garrett is clever. If he is holding back for late season surprises, he's playing a dangerous game because it might not matter.