Dallas4ever
Active Member
- Messages
- 2,547
- Reaction score
- 2
Hostile;2926569 said:IMO, Wade would have to win the Super Bowl to save his job. He has a 3% chance of that happening.
That sounds about right to me.
Hostile;2926569 said:IMO, Wade would have to win the Super Bowl to save his job. He has a 3% chance of that happening.
Hostile;2926569 said:It is Wade's contract year and he is not being offered an extension.
Even if Jerry does not go with Jason Garrett (I think he will) I think he would go get Holmgren or Shanahan.
I honestly think the only reasons Wade is here has to do with the amount of money the stadium cost. No way Jerry wants to pay a man not working for him.
Speaking of money, get Ware's deal done.
IMO, Wade would have to win the Super Bowl to save his job. He has a 3% chance of that happening.
So the fact that I know someone who used to work out at the same gym as him in college and says he is a thug plays no part?DallasDomination;2926547 said:Merriman is not a thugg...Why are so many people so sensitive. Feels like I'm in church sometimes and nobody has ever got out of line or done something bad. First of all Nobody knows what really happened with tila tequila. Rich little girls tend to lie and be drama queens.
Merriman is a man child roids or not and if the chance ever came to Bring him to dallas it would be stupid not to accept the idea and be happy about it.
Hostile;2926569 said:IMO, Wade would have to win the Super Bowl to save his job. He has a 3% chance of that happening.
3% = 0.03MarionBarberThe4th;2926590 said:32 teams X 3= 96.
I may need to consult John Glenn, but you are saying we are below average....
DallasEast;2926595 said:3% = 0.03
If you're going apply Hostile's percentage to teams (which I don't believe he was doing so in his post), then:
32 teams X .03 = .96
Not sure what you're asking me, but I'll try and explain my 3% comment better.MarionBarberThe4th;2926590 said:32 teams X 3= 96.
I may need to consult John Glenn, but you are saying we are below average....
4 winning seasons. 2005, 2006, 2007, & 2008. Last non winning season was 2004.Chocolate Lab;2926607 said:It's a week before the season opener, coming off two winning seasons, and there is this much talk -- with certainty -- about the current coach being fired.
Very strange. I don't ever remember anything like it.
Chocolate Lab;2926607 said:It's a week before the season opener, coming off two winning seasons, and there is this much talk -- with certainty -- about the current coach being fired.
Very strange. I don't ever remember anything like it.
Hostile;2926609 said:4 winning seasons. 2005, 2006, 2007, & 2008. Last non winning season was 2004.
Are you discussing what Hostile posted or Vegas odds?MarionBarberThe4th;2926600 said:Vegas has us at 12-1. A solid 8.3% chance.
Hostile;2926609 said:4 winning seasons. 2005, 2006, 2007, & 2008. Last non winning season was 2004.
Yeah, Vegas looks at it in a different manner. Statistically speaking my way is mathematically correct. Theirs is to induce betting.MarionBarberThe4th;2926600 said:Vegas has us at 12-1. A solid 8.3% chance.
RS12;2926614 said:If you think a wining season and nothing in the play offs saves his job, I'll sell you Manhattan for 24 dollars.
Landry would never have made it to the 70s with today's fans.Chocolate Lab;2926607 said:It's a week before the season opener, coming off two winning seasons, and there is this much talk -- with certainty -- about the current coach being fired.
Very strange. I don't ever remember anything like it.
Hostile;2926606 said:Not sure what you're asking me, but I'll try and explain my 3% comment better.
1 team wins the Super Bowl. 32 teams.
1/32 = 0.0313 or approximately just barely over 3%.
So if you say the Cowboys are going to win the Super Bowl you have an approximately 3% chance of being right. If however you say that have no chance...
31/32 = .9688 or almost 97% chance of being right.
This is why the naysayers think they are always "right."
DallasEast;2926613 said:Are you discussing what Hostile posted or Vegas odds?
There aren't 96 teams.
If a 3% chance is applied to the odds of Dallas winning the Super Bowl, the Cowboys would enjoy a 96-1 chance of winning the Super Bowl.
Is this what you're implying Hos was stating in his post because I highly doubt he was doing so in that context.