Is there anybody who is missing Parcells as Our Head Coach Right now?

junk;2593619 said:
And when was Wade's last "ultimate success"? How about a playoff win?

Can you imagine what the Cowboys would have finished with Wade and Boy Wonder taking over the talent and the quarterbacks Parcells took over in 2003? What would our four year record be under those two coaching geniuses? 2-14, 3-13, 5-11 (peak year), 3-13. Garrett teases us every year with quotes about how Drew Henson reminds him so much of Troy Aikman, and that this simply must be his breakout year.
 
I wished he had stayed a few more years. He only had a decent QB for one year, not even a full year at that, and the team came within a bobbled snap of winning a playoff game. Also, Romo could have used another year with a real head coach, a guy who wouldn't hesitate to point out his mistakes. IMO, being surrounded by a staff full of butt-kissers has hindered Romo's career a good bit.
 
junk;2593619 said:
And when was Wade's last "ultimate success"? How about a playoff win?
Where, please show me, am I defending Wade in any of this? For the love of all that is decent show me where.
 
burmafrd;2593644 said:
Hos still trying to defend Bellicek. How many rings has he won since Crennel and Weis left?
The point is Burm, he has actually won games and playoff games, and taken his team to a Super Bowl.

Parcells...nope. Below .500 and 0 post season wins.

Just the facts ma'am.
 
Hostile;2594264 said:
The point is Burm, he has actually won games and playoff games, and taken his team to a Super Bowl.

Parcells...nope. Below .500 and 0 post season wins.

Just the facts ma'am.


Don't do that Hos. You know what showing some of the people around here facts does.
 
Hostile;2594261 said:
Where, please show me, am I defending Wade in any of this? For the love of all that is decent show me where.

Define decent.
 
Bach;2594272 said:
Define decent.
You can choose your own standard for decent because it will not matter. Nowhere in this endless diatribe about PARCELLS have I defended WADE. So the friggin' definition is irrelevant.
 
Hostile;2594278 said:
You can choose your own standard for decent because it will not matter. Nowhere in this endless diatribe about PARCELLS have I defended WADE. So the friggin' definition is irrelevant.

:laugh2:
 
Hostile;2594278 said:
You can choose your own standard for decent because it will not matter. Nowhere in this endless diatribe about PARCELLS have I defended WADE. So the friggin' definition is irrelevant.


Hey then the definition and Bach have something in common.

Just kidding. That sounds more mean than I thought it should have.
 
BraveHeartFan;2594283 said:
Hey then the definition and Bach have something in common.

Just kidding. That sounds more mean than I thought it should have.
I don't have any issues with the man. That isn't a 2 way street, but if he needs to be offended by me there's nothing I can do about it. Been down that road before as he well knows.
 
Hostile;2594287 said:
I don't have any issues with the man. That isn't a 2 way street, but if he needs to be offended by me there's nothing I can do about it. Been down that road before as he well knows.

Don't start the self-crucifixion just yet. I thought you'd know I was kidding about the "define decent" post, but apparently not.
 
Bach;2594297 said:
Don't start the self-crucifixion just yet. I thought you'd know I was kidding about the "define decent" post, but apparently not.
I did know. I was just letting the other guy know I don't have any issues with you. Nothing more.
 
Hostile;2594308 said:
I meant that. You can give the word any definition you want. It won't matter to me. I'm not defending Wade. I've been calling him Tommy Boy for months now. It has nothing whatsoever to do with not missing Parcells.

I know you meant that. I was just kidding with you about "define decent". You said you knew I was kidding, but you gave me a serious response, clearly not knowing I was kidding.

Oh. nevermind.
 
Bach;2594312 said:
I know you meant that. I was just kidding with you about "define decent". You said you knew I was kidding, but you gave me a serious response, clearly not knowing I was kidding.

Oh. nevermind.
If you look that as a serious response know this...I've been sick since 2 o'clock this morning and am probably not very funny at the moment. In my head, it was not serious and serene.
 
InmanRoshi;2593840 said:
Can you imagine what the Cowboys would have finished with Wade and Boy Wonder taking over the talent and the quarterbacks Parcells took over in 2003? What would our four year record be under those two coaching geniuses? 2-14, 3-13, 5-11 (peak year), 3-13. Garrett teases us every year with quotes about how Drew Henson reminds him so much of Troy Aikman, and that this simply must be his breakout year.

I think, for whatever reason, people are so bitter about Parcells that they automatically want to dismiss anything he did in Dallas.

This team would still be mired in the 5-11 cellar if it weren't for his guiding hand.

Unfortunately, Jerry let him take a good piece of that framework that he laid down with him to Miami. Seems to work OK there as well.

I can buy the argument that he may have worn out his welcome and wouldn't have been able to get anything more out of the team. He more or less alluded to that himself. But if my choices now were BP or Wade Phillips, I'd take BP in a heartbeat.

I'm so down on Phillips that I'd actually welcome Shanahan.
 
Hostile;2593594 said:
Parcells has nevere won a post season game without Belichick.

what exactly is it that you think Belichick did while with the Giants that makes him the all-moving force behind those seasons?

you guys act like Belichick had full autonomy to run those Ds, when Parcells has never given any of his coordinators that type of power

so, I ask, what is that Belichick did? answer that, and I'll give this argument a little more credence
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,675
Messages
13,825,781
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top