LOL.
Well the event on the 22nd calls into question her credibility. Why the need to lie about the events on the 22nd, if she had been assaulted on the 4 previous days. In fact, why not call the cops on any of the 4 previous days? Further, medical analysis suggests that some of the injuries pre-dated the week in question, which again, would call into question her credibility.
Fact is, the league simply is just taking snippets of evidence that favor their case and basically ignoring evidence that undermines them. As noted above, they essentially made the determination long ago Elliott was guilty and it was up to him to prove he was innocent. They didn't find his defense sufficient enough.