Teams have scored over 30 points on the rams every game they've played except one, and in that game they've scored 24. We held the Chiefs to 17 despite them having excellent field position all game. If Janoris was this monster corner, the score would have been flipped. We would have been held to 7 points.
Claiborne actually goes up to guys and makes tackles. He had one solid tackle against Gates. When he got trucked against Jamaal Charles, he actually attempted to make the tackle, but that's 'soft'. On the other hand, it's fine for Mike Jenkins to completely move out of the way of the runningback and that's not soft? The very reason we even went to get Mo was because we were getting lit up through the air... so obviously Jenkins wasn't this unbelievable near shut-down corner like this forum seems to be proposing.
Guys want Janoris Jenkins, and the rams have given up over 30 points in all except 1 game, and in that game they've given up 24 points? On the other hand, we keep the Chiefs to 17 points despite them having excellent field position all game... held the rams to 7. Against the giants, they hurt us through the air, but the game shouldn't have been nowhere near close after the defense gives you 2 turnovers for scores and an additional 4 opportunities to the offense via turnover. Mo's guy caught a few passes this game, but it was the linebackers who were really getting lit up. 2 touchdowns on Carter by Woodhead and 1 on Lee by Gates. That accounts for 21 points. Should we trade Lee and Carter as well? Mo's become the new Felix Jones and Martellus Bennett, aka the guy we need to lay the blame on.
We've constantly made every single change you can think of. Got rid of all of the 'problem players', got rid of the defensive coordinator. Shored up the O-line. The only two constants on this team have been Romo and Garrett.