I guess I knew there would be a meltdown on the board by a good chunk of the population. I understand the argument against taking a RB that high in the draft, and I'm still not sure about how I feel overall about it.
But ...
To those of you arguing that we should have used the pick on defense, here's what I'm not able to wrap my head around. I do indeed understand that we need to shore up our defense.
This was only one pick.
Yes, it was the highest we've picked in years. But let me ask you a question: would a Jalen Ramsey or DeForrest Buckner have really improved our defense that dramatically this year?
I think if we took all of our remaining picks and spent them on offense, our defense would probably be in about the same shape as we were heading into 2014. Right? We might be a shade better at the safety position with Byron Jones, and maybe Cedric Thornton improves the line a little, but for the most part, it would be a wash .
So, lets say even if we quit the 2016 draft right now, ruling out any health issues, we're pretty much at the same talent level on defense, and maybe a bit better on offense than the 2014 team we fielded that made it to the playoffs.
But here's the thing ...
We still have 8 (?) more picks to improve our defense. And there are some pretty talented players left on the board.
I guess what I'm saying is, in the big picture, why don't we wait and see how the rest of the draft pans out before we decry that our defense is going to drag us down to the abyss in 2016.
The way I see it, we're probably a bit better (on paper) talent-wise than we were heading into 2014 ... and we have several draft picks ahead of us that could really tip the scale pretty heavily in our direction!