It Would be Dumb to Draft a QB in the 1st This Year

myslamsareolder

Active Member
Messages
260
Reaction score
60
Listen, I know It's the easy conclussion to come to. After all, Romo being out almost the entire year certainly left a bitter taste. Our backup situation is unacceptable and Romo is certainly no spring chicken. That's just it though, our backup situation is unacceptable. No QB we draft will be a capable number 2.

We need to, as fans, sit down and make a pros and cons list. I have and the cons outweigh the pros. I cannot overstate the importance the role of the new rookie contract rules plays in this. We can assume we will draft in a similar spot as when we drafted Mo. He got just over 4 million per year on his 4 year deal. Do you want to pay a rookie backup 4 million?

Even worse than that, everyone wants us to groom Romo's heir. That's just not the NFL we live in. Stop pointing to Rodgers. He got a 5 year deal paying 1.5 mil per year. Notice I said 5 years... We can no longer do 5 year deals.

So here is a hypothetical for you: Romo plays 3 more years and then retires. Good, you have a 1st rounder waiting in the wings, right? Well, yes, except with very little game tape to judge you now have to decide, before he even starts his first season as starter, to give him a 5th year option worth 10+ million, or risk him having a good year and being a UFA. That is what is called a lose-lose. It's Miles Austin and Doug Free all over again, but worse. Unless the cowboys are willing to cut Romo after 2017 regardless if he is "done" or not it is a bad move to draft a QB in the first.

This QB class is mediocre at best. These players are more Locker, Ponder, or Gabbert, not Newton, Luck, or even Winston or Mariota. They are the kind of QBs a team who doesn't have a QB gambles on. Were not one of those teams and in this modern NFL you shouldn't draft a 1st round QB unless you haven't a QB at all.

We need a backup, so let's pay a backup. Lets get a Hasselbeck, or a Fitzpatrick. It's like you have an iPhone 5s. The iPhone 6s comes out next month. You don't buy the iPhone 6 because you're worried your phone might die. You hope it lasts the month and if it doesn't you borrow a friend's old phone to get you until the iPhone 6s comes out. Phones are too expensive these days.
 

The Natural

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,205
Reaction score
18,969
one of the first 4 picks should be a QB. Doesn't have to be in the first, but that's kind of what these guys get paid to do..you know, develop talent.
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,893
Reaction score
27,489
I'm not reading all of that to know we NEED a QB in this draft and it should come from the first round. I don't care if he sucks in the future or not, this is what we need. We've drafted every other position, now is the time to draft this position and put some seriousness in to it. People say there aren't any good QBs coming out, yet in the past when the guru's thought there were, there weren't any. No one knows for sure who's whom or what a quarterback could develop into. Stop this nonsense, we may waste 10 years screwing around with this position.
 

Vinnie2u

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,817
Reaction score
11,269
If the people who are paid to evaluate players think that a QB is worth a top 10 pick than you take him. YouTube Scouts don't know jack about player development. Romo at this point is brittle. He's gonna take hits. It cannot be avoided.. Time to move on.
 

dogberry

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,009
Reaction score
773
When we are evaluating a QB, which traits can we fix and which are almost impossible to correct.

1. Arm Strength
2. Reading defenses
3. Mechanics
4. Quick release (is this part of 3?)
5. Mental clock
6. Nimbleness
7. Bravery
8. Desire
9. Willingness to throw the ball away
10. Other
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
We have to start drafting QBs every year. A top 5 pick this year has to be a QB or more picks for a QB next year.

It's not cheap but first round picks can be controlled for 6 years before they hit UFA. They can always be traded if Romo can stay healthy.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,723
Reaction score
95,221
I'm not reading all of that to know we NEED a QB in this draft and it should come from the first round. I don't care if he sucks in the future or not, this is what we need. We've drafted every other position, now is the time to draft this position and put some seriousness in to it. People say there aren't any good QBs coming out, yet in the past when the guru's thought there were, there weren't any. No one knows for sure who's whom or what a quarterback could develop into. Stop this nonsense, we may waste 10 years screwing around with this position.

And when you draft on "need" it tends to bite you in the ***. So no, you don't take a QB in the Top 7 because you "need" one. You take the best player on your board and if that's a FS over QB, so be it. If it's a WR over a QB, so be it. And if it's a QB as the highest on your board, then you take him.

People are overthinking this way too much because of the bizarre belief that apparently this is the only time ever the team will be able to fix the QB position and that it absolutely, positively has to happen in the Top Ten this year.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,513
Reaction score
17,235
Disagree with the OP completely.going by Romos injury history he ain't playing for 3 more years.heck he might retire if he gets seriously hurt, what are we going to do then?.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,513
Reaction score
17,235
And when you draft on "need" it tends to bite you in the ***. So no, you don't take a QB in the Top 7 because you "need" one. You take the best player on your board and if that's a FS over QB, so be it. If it's a WR over a QB, so be it. And if it's a QB as the highest on your board, then you take him.

People are overthinking this way too much because of the bizarre belief that apparently this is the only time ever the team will be able to fix the QB position and that it absolutely, positively has to happen in the Top Ten this year.

We are drafting for need when we draft another CB in the first.the QB position sunk us this year and not any DB.
 
Top