MichaelWinicki;1354813 said:Agreed.
You're more likely to see the 285lb Hatcher at DE.
LatinMind;1354829 said:i think u'll more likely see 275 lber ellis at De next yr with ware. and hatcher being the primary backup
It all depends on whether we're staying in a 3-4 or not, of course. Even beyond that it depends on what we do in FA. If we do stay in a 3-4, I'd put Moss right up in the top 3 or 4 most likely picks.MichaelWinicki;1354833 said:Well that could be too.
I just don't see us drafting Moss.
MichaelWinicki;1354833 said:Well that could be too.
I just don't see us drafting Moss.
theogt;1354834 said:It all depends on whether we're staying in a 3-4 or not, of course. Even beyond that it depends on what we do in FA. If we do stay in a 3-4, I'd put Moss right up in the top 3 or 4 most likely picks.
LatinMind;1354828 said:maybe dallas should forget about every other posistion except De and LB for ever and ever
Yeah, he played OLB late in the year. That doesn't mean he's best suited for that position or that he needs to say there, though.LatinMind;1354841 said:didnt carpenter play the OLb at the end of the yr? why would dallas move him back to the middle and dismiss his play at the outside? that doesnt make any sense at all. if they wanted a ILB they could get one in FA. dallas doesnt need anymore rookies switching posistions. they need verteran leadership
theogt;1354845 said:Yeah, he played OLB late in the year. That doesn't mean he's best suited for that position or that he needs to say there, though.
Broken record: Move Carp to James's position and draft a real OLB.
Nice read. Thanks for posting!LatinMind;1354849 said:yup sounds like ur broken record, and it still doesnt sound good
LatinMind;1354849 said:yup sounds like ur broken record, and it still doesnt sound good
Oh please. It has nothing to do with Lawson. You guys can homer out about Carp being a 3-4 OLB all you want, but he's not fit for the position.MichaelWinicki;1354854 said:Yep.
Ogt had wood for Lawson... Who sorta sucked this year. At least Carp picked up the pace as the year went on.
theogt;1354857 said:Oh please. It has nothing to do with Lawson. You guys can homer out about Carp being a 3-4 OLB all you want, but he's not fit for the position.
That's certainly true. I like Carpenter a lot as a 4-3 linebacker.MichaelWinicki;1354860 said:Well when we go back to the 4-3 it won't matter then.
theogt;1354862 said:That's certainly true. I like Carpenter a lot as a 4-3 linebacker.
See my edit too re: Lawson.
Well, there were conflicting reports all over the place about his weight. Some said he naturally gravitated towards 230 and some had him at 250. No one really knew the answer. Given the Ellis move (which none of us knew about at that point) it may have been a better move to not draft a LB at all.MichaelWinicki;1354867 said:BTW I'm impressed you manned up on Lawson.
I think it may save me having to school you on the Cowboy's pick this year.
theogt;1354869 said:Well, there were conflicting reports all over the place about his weight. Some said he naturally gravitated towards 230 and some had him at 250. No one really knew the answer. Given the Ellis move (which none of us knew about at that point) it may have been a better move to not draft a LB at all.
But my main opposition to Carp then was that he doesn't fit the role of a 3-4 OLB. I haven't seen anything since then that makes me think he can fit that role in the future, either.
I'd be stunned if Ellis comes back as a three-down player, especially in a 4-3 offense where he doesn't line up at LB and get a break from battling 320 pound tackles every play.i think u'll more likely see 275 lber ellis at De next yr with ware.
SteamedSoup;1354876 said:I'd be stunned if Ellis comes back as a three-down player, especially in a 4-3 offense where he doesn't line up at LB and get a break from battling 320 pound tackles every play.
With his age and his injury, I think Ellis is going to have to pick a role and run with it. I just can't see him being an all-everything player. Frankly, even without the injury, I wouldn't have been looking for him to keep it up forever anyway.
In my opinion, if we go to the 4-3, either he'll be the pass-rusher on 3rd down or he'll be a responsible guy against the run on 1st and 2nd down.
And some of you might laugh at the idea of him being limited to basically being a run-stopper by only being used on 1st and 2nd down, but if you stop and think about it, it could happen. You certainly can't rule out the possibility that our run defense could suddenly start looking bad if we go with a smaller 4-3 front and if we don't have Zimmer reminding everyone to play the run first (which, I mean, there's a down side to him doing that, but he also did it for a reason -- to stop the run). If we come out and get run on in the first few games, we might be forced into being more responsible on first and second downs.