@CATCH17 is probably the closest in this thread with his assessment of Jaylon.
People get this impression that he's a sideline to sideline speed-backer based on his reputation from Notre Dame. He got much stronger during his rehab, and is now just straight-up violent heading downhill. He seems more straight-linish than before though. The team usually uses him pretty well in that regard - blitz the center, run to the sideline, fill the A gap, trigger downhill on the TE from zone, etc - to where he doesn't have to do much more than sprint downhill and clean someone's clock, and he's darn good at it. But LVE is the guy they put in space on the weak side for a reason.
LVE is just a freak, it's incredible how good he is in the open field. Backs and WRs try to stutter-step him, thinking this 6'4" 260 pound LB won't be able to hang with them and will be forced to commit. But LVE can mirror athletes 50 pounds lighter than him, and when he grabs them they just drop. He makes some VERY difficult stops in space look easy.
The biggest weakness with Jaylon right now is probably man coverage, he seems to be a lot less comfortable when his assignment's not "run/drop to this spot", and good TEs can shake him if they're sent downfield. Watch him vs the Eagles, there were times when Ertz and Goedert took him to task. As a 4-3 Will, LVE basically has no weaknesses IMO.
I guess in an evaluation and opinion view thread like this, you’re gonna get various different eye ball assessment on that player. Maybe we all will get into a habit of over-analyzing a certain player.
Some are gonna think Jaylon’s flaw is man coverage, to which if it was, .why would HE be the sole, only LB left on the field in the nickel ?
I tend to think man coverage is actually his best trait in pass coverage.
And you know why he had the reputation as a sideline to sideline speed backer coming out of Notre Dame, because flow and pursuit was indeed his best trait as a run defender.
And if Jaylon was just a straight line player, which would mean he has no agility, change of direction skills to help him in coverage, so why couldn’t coordinators take advantage of such a flaw?
Also I know people are dependant on highlights to try to place light on a player .. but it’s a reason why they called them "highlights", ..you’ll be limited to just only the good plays ..the standout plays,.. but it won’t include the minuses, flaws.
i dont think it's gonna be a tell-all to a certain player.
I would think that If you really want a fair and equal assessment of a player, why not try a clip where you can see his ENTIRE game tape, where you can see both plus vs minus, series for series ?
LVE may have a weakness as of right now, and it has nothing to do with his physical ability, but more so inexperience.
He was subbed out for Sean Lee in the Rams playoff game and that had to be assumed that he was being overwhelmed and confused mentally with maybe
all the motion and misdirections that the Rams were throwing at those LBs and who knows how much affected their run gap responsibilities too.
That was puzzling for just Vander Esch, because I also thought Jaylon was having his issues too. But the rookie getting yanked took the bulk of the blame among the LBs ?
As terrific as LVE's ball hawk skills are, i would wonder why was the rookie being ousted out of the defense in obvious passing downs, with Jaylon being the sole, lone LB on the nickel ?
Is there some "rookie-ness " that Richard prefer not to have in there, or was the defense just already set to have Jaylon only in the nickel ?
Overall and long term, I really believe that's going to eventually change for the better as LVE gains more experience.