Jean-Jacques Taylor: Henson Project Could Be Sacked

bbgun said:
Trust me, the next coach won't be any more enamored.

trust me - always believe 100% those who have enough confidence to start off their thoughts w/"trust me" for they can never be wrong.
 
iceberg said:
a world pretty much smart enough to go the opposite of anything you say, graney. : )

HH posts about Henson, iceberg is never far behind. I'd like my jock back, please.

BTW, the above statement made no sense, either in context or grammar wise
 
wileedog said:
Its not what you paid for the car that matters, its how much rust is on it.

I think you knocked that one out of the park! So much for Drew's pedigree.:lmao:
 
HeavyHitta31 said:
HH posts about Henson, iceberg is never far behind. I'd like my jock back, please.

BTW, the above statement made no sense, either in context or grammar wise

to you, i'm sure it didn't. to anyone who doesn't call the 4th grade the best 5 years of their life, i'm sure they're ok.
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
Speaking of Pride, it's time to let it Kartr. This always interjecting Quincy in any QB discussion has passed it's born on date. You know me and while I may not agree with you on matters of QB, I have always been straight up with you. You have to let it go at some point.

Do you say the same to those who continue to bash Quincy when his name wasn't even part of the original discussion. This is the problem I have with the objectivity here, it's okay to bash Quincy whenever you feel like it, but it's not okay to say anything positive about him. My comment was comparing Cowboy quarterbacks, not just about QC, so since he was a Cowboy qb and played at the same time as Hutch and Romo, who is still on the team, my comment was completely relavant.By the way, with all his faults, Q never needed to go to NFL Europe and was never seriously challenged by the likes of Romo, plus he has a winning record against both Vinnie and Bledsoe, who also have worn the star. Again, relevance.
 
iceberg said:
to you, i'm sure it didn't. to anyone who doesn't call the 4th grade the best 5 years of their life, i'm sure they're ok.

Ah, insults. I guess I shouldnt expect anything less, after all it's all you're good at, right? Too bad you still can't provide any facts to back up your case that my opinion of Henson is wrong.

BTW, here is another free grammar lesson. Here is how you should have worded that sentence:

An organization smart enough to go the against anything you say, graney

Next time, I will charge a fee for that.
 
HeavyHitta31 said:
Ah, insults. I guess I shouldnt expect anything less, after all it's all you're good at, right? Too bad you still can't provide any facts to back up your case that my opinion of Henson is wrong.

BTW, here is another free grammar lesson. Here is how you should have worded that sentence:

Next time, I will charge a fee for that.

i'll put the bill right next to your common sense so no one will miss either. but, i did mean "the world" and as an afterthought to your question, the sentence structure is fine. not ideal, but fine in that context.

you still think i give a flip what you care of henson. >g<
 
kartr said:
Do you say the same to those who continue to bash Quincy when his name wasn't even part of the original discussion. This is the problem I have with the objectivity here, it's okay to bash Quincy whenever you feel like it, but it's not okay to say anything positive about him. My comment was comparing Cowboy quarterbacks, not just about QC, so since he was a Cowboy qb and played at the same time as Hutch and Romo, who is still on the team, my comment was completely relavant.By the way, with all his faults, Q never needed to go to NFL Europe and was never seriously challenged by the likes of Romo, plus he has a winning record against both Vinnie and Bledsoe, who also have worn the star. Again, relevance.

You don't get it, do you?

You are moaning about people jumping on Krankcase...BUT...IT'S YOU that always brings his name into a dicsussion about CURRENT QB's!

That bum is long gone...and you still defend him? :confused: Krankcase cannot even make it in the CFL! Now, how bad is that?

Do what the poster from Albuquerque suggested...forget Krankcase, or get some therapy....hell, try some shrooms! Something!

Quincy Carter is a total failure as an NFL player...actually as a football player! Accept that fact! He has problems, bro...he's done! GET FREAKING OVER IT!

Here, have two Stars to help you with your recovery, OK?

:starspin :starspin
 
5Stars said:
You don't get it, do you?

You are moaning about people jumping on Krankcase...BUT...IT'S YOU that always brings his name into a dicsussion about CURRENT QB's!

That bum is long gone...and you still defend him? :confused: Krankcase cannot even make it in the CFL! Now, how bad is that?

Do what the poster from Albuquerque suggested...forget Krankcase, or get some therapy....hell, try some shrooms! Something!

Quincy Carter is a total failure as an NFL player...actually as a football player! Accept that fact! He has problems, bro...he's done! GET FREAKING OVER IT!

Here, have two Stars to help you with your recovery, OK?

:starspin :starspin


:lmao2: :lmao:
 
kartr said:
The fact that Henson can't beat out Romo, an udfa, tells the whole story, do you question if Aikman could beat out Romo. Heck, Romo couldn't beat out Carter or hold your nose, Hutch for that matter. I think we all know realistically that Henson isn't going to make it. If there was a shred starting ability, he would be gaining ground on Romo, not falling further behind heading into his 3rd training camp. There is a reason that Romo will be getting more playing time, one, to protect Bledsoe from injury, two: to see if he is capable of starting in case Bledsoe gets injured, they already know Romo is better than Henson. He's only still here because of Bill and Jerry's pride.

Training Camp hasn't even started yet...So how is it that Henson hasn't beat Romo out yet?

He beat him out his first year without any of the NFLE experience.

Now he has that and AFTER Training Camp then we'll talk about who can't beat out whom.
 
ConcordCowboy said:
Training Camp hasn't even started yet...So how is it that Henson hasn't beat Romo out yet?

He beat him out his first year without any of the NFLE experience.

Now he has that and AFTER Training Camp then we'll talk about who can't beat out whom.

Hear hear...

Sheesh guys wait and see 1st.
 
kartr said:
By the way, with all his faults, Q never needed to go to NFL Europe
Circumstances between Henson and QC and the way each entered the NFL were completely different.
 
How can a undrafted player from somewhere in the boondocks college who has never took a NFL snap be qualifed as TRUE backup QB, I no what people are saying about Henson,,,,He's not gonna make it, cut him now..BLA BLA BLA

Bottomline they are both worthy of the being the number 3 QB, The Cowboys are one injury away (to Bledsoe) from playoff contender to total melt down.... TO will tear this team apart if a subpar QB has to step in...Its all or nothin at the QB Slot..... There is not a qualified Backup qb on this team.
 
5Stars said:
Oh, no....here we go! :rolleyes:

Shrooms kicking in?

LOL, "kicking in" man its been a while since i heard that phrase, you must have some experience too.:)
 
iceberg said:
but if you won't give them 2-3 when there's no "cost" to the franchise, when will you give them that 16?

when they're ready to help you win football games

believe me, if Parcells is forced to start Vinny, then that must show you how green the guys behind him are, and listen to Parcells, he said he didn't want to throw Romo to the wolves

think about it, what would be more potentially dangering for a coach, losing a whole team by starting a young guy for 3 games while your team is trying to finish the season on a high note, and maybe, just maybe, get a shot to go to the postseason, or losing that young guy by starting him, who may or may not show you anything? and we all know how much Parcells cares for 1 player above all the others...none
 
I love the Parcell's "I don't want to play him(Henson or Romo) too soon because I could lose them" schtick.
I might be inclined to believe that if Parcells wasn't well known for playing head games with players to toughen them up.
The phrase "I don't want to lose the player" is code for "I can't admit the guy I brought in (who played for me before) is a mistake".
No way in hell Romo or Henson shouldn't have been getting playing time instead of Vinny. Vinny was horrible and everyone on the team and in the stands could see it.
 
2much2soon said:
I love the Parcell's "I don't want to play him(Henson or Romo) too soon because I could lose them" schtick.
I might be inclined to believe that if Parcells wasn't well known for playing head games with players to toughen them up.
The phrase "I don't want to lose the player" is code for "I can't admit the guy I brought in (who played for me before) is a mistake".
No way in hell Romo or Henson shouldn't have been getting playing time instead of Vinny. Vinny was horrible and everyone on the team and in the stands could see it.
Anyone remember Eli Manning's first 5 games as a pro? Care to imagine what the Dallas press and CZ drama queens would do to Romo or Henson if either of them started 3 disasterous games at the end of the year? Then what? Pickup Bledsoe as a vet FA, and put the young guy back on the bench to stew a bit longer? Pass on Bledsoe because you've already started the Henson/Romo era? Draft a new player at 11 instead of Demarcus Ware?

Get real.
 
Idgit said:
Anyone remember Eli Manning's first 5 games as a pro? Care to imagine what the Dallas press and CZ drama queens would do to Romo or Henson if either of them started 3 disasterous games at the end of the year? Then what? Pickup Bledsoe as a vet FA, and put the young guy back on the bench to stew a bit longer? Pass on Bledsoe because you've already started the Henson/Romo era? Draft a new player at 11 instead of Demarcus Ware?

Get real.

so fear of the press and forum drama queens guides pro football decisions?

*someone* does need to "get real".
 
iceberg said:
so fear of the press and forum drama queens guides pro football decisions?

*someone* does need to "get real".

No. Not fear. Forum drama queens are tiresome, not scary.
I'm talking about an awareness of the damage that three bad games and a long offseason of second-guessing and bad press would do to the team. And for what? Three games of experience with a bad offense and a weak OL? To collect what data, exactly?

As I said above, unless the player just plays lights-out, you only create confusion and uncertainty by playing him for just 3 games at the end of the year.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,188
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top