HungryLion
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,893
- Reaction score
- 65,125
So you saved money, to tell us we don't have any money??? I'm so confused!!!!
He gave most of that money to a WR who was never as good and tore his ACL.
So you saved money, to tell us we don't have any money??? I'm so confused!!!!
got to love this cat!!!!He gave most of that money to a WR who was never as good and tore his ACL.
Exactly, especially since he doesn't do anything in FA.He is such an idiot. Draft picks Jerry! You need draft picks!
Not having a replacement was dumb but Amari was overpriced for what he was at the time.a foolish one. especially considering the way the browns immediately converted his salary to make it more palatable, and the jones immediately gave the savings to gallup. it was a dumb move no matter the rationalization
Fair, but “it did not work” happens far too often.The Cooper trade is very understandable.
And they gave the money to Gallup, feeling he would be pre-injured Gallup. It did not work.
I do not Balme the FO for either move.
Hindsight is always 20-20. And a chance for fans to whine about some things instead of understanding the circumstances at the time.
No, I am not defending Jerry overall. I am just saying the moves were justified at the time.
I’m sorry, but in no universe was pre-injury Gallup on par with Cooper. It made way more sense to restructure Cooper, and that’s not an injury hindsight observation. Trading Cooper had as much to do with a personal choice made by him as anything else. Jerry made the deal with Cooper from a position of weakness instead of strength, or at least, one of neutrality.The Cooper trade is very understandable.
And they gave the money to Gallup, feeling he would be pre-injured Gallup. It did not work.
I do not Balme the FO for either move.
Hindsight is always 20-20. And a chance for fans to whine about some things instead of understanding the circumstances at the time.
No, I am not defending Jerry overall. I am just saying the moves were justified at the time.
I did not say they were on par with each other. But Gallup was not a bad player. He was younger, cost less. And did not check out in games as Cooper did at times .I’m sorry, but in no universe was pre-injury Gallup on par with Cooper. It made way more sense to restructure Cooper, and that’s not an injury hindsight observation. Trading Cooper had as much to do with a personal choice made by him as anything else. Jerry made the deal with Cooper from a position of weakness instead of strength, or at least, one of neutrality.
Cowboys owner Jerry Jones on @1053thefan when asked about WR Amari Cooper being traded from Cleveland to Buffalo last week for a 3rd-round pick after Dallas moved Cooper for a 5th-round pick in 2022:
“We went for the dollars. When we traded Amari Cooper, we saved almost $20 million for our cap and the future. We took a lesser draft pick to get that savings. When he made this move the other day, Cleveland went for more draft pick and less savings. It was very simple.”
That's just not true.It’s obscene how badly the Cowboys front office gets hosed in trades.
I'm so confused!!!!
good morning big fella
That isn't why Cooper was traded to Cleveland.Coop like Dez did not get along with Dak so he had to go
Why was he?That isn't why Cooper was traded to Cleveland.
hindsight is 20-20 is only useable when people weren't actively saying the same things in the moment. even if gallup did bounce back to pre-injury form (no one thought he would, and definitely not immediately) it would have STILL been moronic.The Cooper trade is very understandable.
And they gave the money to Gallup, feeling he would be pre-injured Gallup. It did not work.
I do not Balme the FO for either move.
Hindsight is always 20-20. And a chance for fans to whine about some things instead of understanding the circumstances at the time.
No, I am not defending Jerry overall. I am just saying the moves were justified at the time.
None of us knows that for sure.hindsight is 20-20 is only useable when people weren't actively saying the same things in the moment. even if gallup did bounce back to pre-injury form (no one thought he would, and definitely not immediately) it would have STILL been moronic.
I don't get how Lance for a 4th is a win for the 9ers. They gave up 2 firsts for this guy, and they look smart?It’s obscene how badly the Cowboys front office gets hosed in trades. A 4th for Lance looks awfully shrewd for the 9ers in hindsight. Cowboys only good trade in forever was for Hank.
look who finally decides to show upNone of us knows that for sure.