I said the pro marijuana lobbyist had taken over this thread, why are you labeling them my opposition? I have taken no pro or com marijuana stance here. What I have done is make a stance for an employer to make what every policy they wish to make and expect employees to comply. I also commented on federal law trumping state law no matter the topic.
Jerry's motivation for what he is doing is business.
Grandstanding? Really? You perceive what I'm doing is grandstanding? Thank you, you give me far too much credit. Criminal liability is not dependent on a business putting it's head in the sand and ignoring criminal activity.
Cause you have clearly set yourself up as the anti-marijuana lobby. And no one is arguing that the NFL should not enforce the rules as written. The call is to change NFL rules. The NFLPA and at least one owner are working towards that end and many people support the move.
And what difference does that make? Nevermind you have no way of knowing Jerry's motivation; the rhetoric he has used indicates support for marijuana's therapeutic properties. Fact of the matter is that "business" is likely high on the list of NFL owners in general. If 17 of them decide they want it then it happens.
And yes, grandstanding. Your initial ploy was to paint people that did not agree with you as criminals or at least as aiding criminals but then you were shut down quickly. You're still trying to talk around it.
The NFL will incur no criminal liability if they change the rule. You can play the blame game and doomsay in your own head it fi makes you feel better.