There is no proof that 70 told the ref that he was eligible. 68 says he reported and 70 says he didn’t, and Campbell said the plan was to confuse the cowboys. So either the lion players are lying or the refs got confused.There's is no proof that the ref got confused. There is plenty of proof that this keystone cops level attempt to subvert the reporting rules backfired tremendously.
And of course it should have never even happened anyway because Dallas got screwed by one of the worst calls ever on the tripping. Seriously, did that ref penalize us because she thought we tried to trip our own player?
So we are going to believe the people who are designing a play to rob dallas of the ability to know who the eligible is? Omg. This cant get any more bizarre. And there is visible proof of 70 reporting and ref acknowledging. We have gone over this 50 times people. It has been settled.There is no proof that 70 told the ref that he was eligible. 68 says he reported and 70 says he didn’t, and Campbell said the plan was to confuse the cowboys. So either the lion players are lying or the refs got confused.
the fact that the refs missed the tripping call is reason to doubt their ability, not support the idea that lions messed up what they were trying to do.
everyone is focused on the wrong thing anyway. The only thing that matters is that the cowboys were told 70 was eligible and that’s what was announced. No telling if the play works had they called it correctly and the defense accounted for him.
This is getting about as bizarre and stupid as it can. There is a rule. It is called the reporting rule. I do think some on here are being purposefully obtuse.That is correct. It’s what society is built upon - laws that defined what is legal and what is not. If there isn’t a law prohibiting it, it’s legal.
There are social norms and “rules” of etiquette that are legal, but not necessarily an accepted standard by the law.
In the sports world, it’s the “spirit” of the game. But that’s a nebulous term - who decides what’s in the spirit and what isn’t? You? Me?
What DC did was not illegal and if it’s not illegal, it isn’t cheating. Again, poor sportsmanship, maybe, but that’s it.
You and I obviously aren’t going to see eye-to-eye on this, so we’ll simply have to agree to disagree.
The nfl video that went out today made it pretty clear. It didn’t seem like 70 could say anything to the ref because he was still running, but he was gesturing like had previously, which apparently is also required.So we are going to believe the people who are designing a play to rob dallas of the ability to know who the eligible is? Omg. This cant get any more bizarre. And there is visible proof of 70 reporting and ref acknowledging. We have gone over this 50 times people. It has been settled.
Campbell issued a statement that he was trying to cheat the cowboys. Case closed.The nfl video that went out today made it pretty clear. It didn’t seem like 70 could say anything to the ref because he was still running, but he was gesturing like had previously, which apparently is also required.
so It all can true. 70 said nothing, but gestured like he was eligible like he had previously and so the ref took it that way.
none of it matters though. play not work if 68 is declared, and they got two more shots. It’s just interesting how it got so muddled.
It is clearly an open and shut case. Campbell tried to subvert a rule which should have resulted in an admonition and a fine. This was unethical, sleazy, and scurrilous. All of those who are confused on here or elsewhere (like Skip and undisputed clowns) and blaming officlals are really demonstrating an incredible lack of intelligence and awareness. Perspicacious people got it an hour after it happened.Jerry put it the same way I was and the same way as one analyst, the one that does a show with McCoy and Joy Taylor.
This was not a trick play. It was a sneaky attempt to deprive the Cowboys of the right to determine edibility. The administrative process necessary to adhere to the rules regarding determining eligibility cannot be interfered with. Campbell was deliberately doing just that and he admitted it.
On the bright side of it for Campbel, he was successful. He certainly fooled the refs.
The refs were not fooled and anyone that entertains that is confused. The refs made an immediate and correct decision. No confusion.Jerry put it the same way I was and the same way as one analyst, the one that does a show with McCoy and Joy Taylor.
This was not a trick play. It was a sneaky attempt to deprive the Cowboys of the right to determine edibility. The administrative process necessary to adhere to the rules regarding determining eligibility cannot be interfered with. Campbell was deliberately doing just that and he admitted it.
On the bright side of it for Campbel, he was successful. He certainly fooled the refs.
Except that 70 ran on the field and held up his arm and rubbed his chest which is how a player notifies the refs they are eligible.Gee Jerry, 70 only reported as eligible 6 times during the game already, there was no rules broken or plays to break the rules folks on the two point play, just a ref that assumed 70 was reporting when he it was actually 68...
Campbell has done something that will haunt him the rest of his career. Why? Because he has made it clear he will do anything to win, ethics be damned. So we are now all on the lookout for the subsequent attempts to win by cheating and they will come. Everyone knows Bellichick is a cheater. He tried to steal signals, He tried deflating footballs. He also has designed some questionable plays that very well may have been designed to subvert established rules. Campbell is Bellichick‘s protege in this respect. He is not smart, clever, or ingenious. He is a cheat and scurrilous liar and expects his players to lie for him and they do and will.When the going gets tough the tough cheat? Campbell is proving himself not to be a high character head coach. What annoyed me further about the trickery is that they tried to intimidate the ref by arguing vehemently against the call. It's one thing to disguise a play attempt on the field and it's another to undermine or manipulate the rules. Don't get the scenario confused.
The play was designed and carried out exactly as designed. Campbell attempted to subvert the rule. That is cheating. 70 did report no question.Except that 70 ran on the field and held up his arm and rubbed his chest which is how a player notifies the refs they are eligible.
So it wasn't just an assumption. It's like signaling for a fair catch and then pretending you didn't.
you have to go up to the ref which 68 did, 70 didn't, makes no sense for 70 to report eligible and then line up in an ineligible position on the line as Aikman stated after the game, ref had a brain fart and assumed it was 70 reporting since he reported numerous times during the game..Except that 70 ran on the field and held up his arm and rubbed his chest which is how a player notifies the refs they are eligible.
So it wasn't just an assumption. It's like signaling for a fair catch and then pretending you didn't.