CowboyRoy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,924
- Reaction score
- 38,930
There is a blizzard of silliness on this forum lately based on failure to understand simple facts.
Myth #1. The Cowboys inability to trade Romo was because of Jerry's sentimentality or friendship with Tony.
The team didn't trade Tony for this simple reason: there were no trading partners willing to assume the risk of an injury-riddled soon-to-be 37 year old quarterback carrying a massive contract.
Proof? ESPN a few hours ago.
Myth #2. Keeping Romo as backup would have only cost the Cowboys $5 million.
Not true. The Cowboys June 1 designation will allow the team the split the dead cap space over two years. Big picture, they save $14 million in base salary. They spread the dead cap hit over two years.
If you want to keep it simple just remember this: they will gain many millions in cap space immediately.
Why would anyone trade for Romo at this point? Anyone with any brains would simply call Jerry's pathetic bluff and wait to see if he would release him first. Once Jerry shows teams he wont just let him go, then he would start to get offers. But of course, bad poker face Jerry couldnt pull it off.