Jimmy Johnson in his book "Swagger," in order to win SB, you need a great QB not a good one

nate dizzle

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,776
Reaction score
17,417
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Explain to all of us living in reality how a "noodle arm" backup qb has the 3rd longest completion in the air this year in the entire NFL?

We all would love to hear this next level analysis from you.
Who are you talking about? When I say noodle armed I am talking about Rush and Purdy. Also what players it you are referencing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
17,366
Who are you talking about? When I say noodle armed I am talking about Rush and Purdy. Also what players it you are referencing?
My misunderstanding...thought it was about Dak lol

Carry on...lol
 

75boyz

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,686
Reaction score
10,536
Advance apologies for plagiarizing Catch17's quote but it has become the standard rule now imo.
And that is:
We need to stop trying to figure out ways to win with Dak. We paid him to be the answer not the problem.

The discussion on Rayne Dakota Prescott begins and ends with these statements imo.
 

Legend

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,393
Reaction score
1,294
Same reason I stated above.

The talent erodes. For Dallas...no salary cap and they had the most talent until it was eroded by the Cap.

Favre kept running into Dallas.

Young ran into Dallas and talent eroded after they were found cheating in 1994.
Also, wear and tear; injuries; and aging.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken

nate dizzle

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,776
Reaction score
17,417
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
My misunderstanding...thought it was about Dak lol

Carry on...lol
No worries. Imo Dak has an average NFL arm. I'm assuming the play you meant was the one to Hilton. If you watch that play you will see Dak has to put his whole body into that throw. Guys with elite arms like Allen can fling it 40 yards throwing off their back foot.
 

noshame

I'm not dead yet......
Messages
14,789
Reaction score
13,260
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
What you need is a quarterback that's not going to lose the Super Bowl for you
 

Captain-Crash

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,542
Reaction score
33,804
No worries. Imo Dak has an average NFL arm. I'm assuming the play you meant was the one to Hilton. If you watch that play you will see Dak has to put his whole body into that throw. Guys with elite arms like Allen can fling it 40 yards throwing off their back foot.
well, dak has a bad thumb, shoulder, ankle, and probably brain too, I can't believe you guys still hating on the legend of dak prescott. I miss those daks is better than so and so threads. sheesh, I guess we will never see them again.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
17,366
No worries. Imo Dak has an average NFL arm. I'm assuming the play you meant was the one to Hilton. If you watch that play you will see Dak has to put his whole body into that throw. Guys with elite arms like Allen can fling it 40 yards throwing off their back foot.
Allen has a 62.3 yard completion this year and Daks is 62.2.

Dak's completion is the 4th longest in the NFL the last two years.

Try again.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
61,618
Reaction score
38,980
If you watched the game; why are you trying to down play Aikman like he rode Emmitt Smith to victory?

I cannot see how fans who watched the Cowboys games live in the early 1990s would ever try to defend Romo and Dak.

Those two were/are not good enough in the playoffs.

Winning a divisional round playoff game should be routine instead of an insurmountable task for the past 27 years.

Nonetheless, that was a huge hold by the 49ers. So not really a break for the Cowboys.

The 49ers got their break in the 1994 NFC Championship when Deion was not penalized for pass interference.
I’m not downplaying Aikman at all he was a great QB but anyone who followed football back in the 90s knows their offense revolved around our great OL and Emmitt Smith and the running game. There’s a reason he became the all-time NFL’s leading rusher. When Emmitt was leading the league in rushing in 92 the Cowboys also had the number one defense. When the Cowboys won the Super Bowl that year Aikman passed for just over 3400 yards and 23 TDs. When they won the Super Bowl in 93 he passed for 3100 yards and only 15 TDs due to our great running attack and defense. Those numbers wouldn’t get it done with the teams we had under Romo and Dak.

I’m certainly not trying to downplay what Aikman did but the facts are Romo and Dak had to do more because the NFL has become a passing league and they never had defenses like the ones the Cowboys had in the 90s. Go look at the struggles Aikman had early in his career and late in his career when he didn’t have the great teams around him. He got booed late in his career and fans wanted him replaced by Randall Cunningham. The fact the 49ers had a holding call that brought back that long TD to Jerry Rice in the 92 conference title game was a huge break for the Cowboys. The 49ers got several breaks in the 94 conference title game with three early turnovers. That’s what cost the Cowboys that game.
 

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,482
Reaction score
17,569
The Cowboys won three SB's with an overall #1 draft pick and two SB's with a Quarterback that would have been the overall #1 draft pick were it not for a 6 year mandatory military committment

Both QB's are in the Hall of Fame.

Therefore, Jimmy's opinion is backed by Cowboys history.
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
25,635
Reaction score
30,850
Dak will very likely never be a great QB, just about as much as Jerry & Son will never shine in what they do. Those of us entertaining ideas of this team reaching a Super Bowl with that being the case are setting themselves up for disappointment. Being entertained is much more realistic with these scenarios continuing, imho. There are far more tragic things in life to be concerned about. Tempering our expectations will be highly advisable.
 
Last edited:

Motorola

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,937
Reaction score
9,704
I guess the only positive is as of this season none of the ELITE QBs have established themselves IN THE NFC.
I understand Rodgers & Brady but they are close to the end.
None of the other starting QBs on the 14 other NFC teams are not, nor should be considered ----ELITE.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,859
Reaction score
15,962
various:
Jimmy's book was written about the pre-salary cap era.
When you could legit build super teams it was much harder to win with normal QBs.
Dak is as good as the QB who won the SB last year.
 

Legend

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,393
Reaction score
1,294
I’m not downplaying Aikman at all he was a great QB but anyone who followed football back in the 90s knows their offense revolved around our great OL and Emmitt Smith and the running game. There’s a reason he became the all-time NFL’s leading rusher. When Emmitt was leading the league in rushing in 92 the Cowboys also had the number one defense. When the Cowboys won the Super Bowl that year Aikman passed for just over 3400 yards and 23 TDs. When they won the Super Bowl in 93 he passed for 3100 yards and only 15 TDs due to our great running attack and defense. Those numbers wouldn’t get it done with the teams we had under Romo and Dak.

I’m certainly not trying to downplay what Aikman did but the facts are Romo and Dak had to do more because the NFL has become a passing league and they never had defenses like the ones the Cowboys had in the 90s. Go look at the struggles Aikman had early in his career and late in his career when he didn’t have the great teams around him. He got booed late in his career and fans wanted him replaced by Randall Cunningham. The fact the 49ers had a holding call that brought back that long TD to Jerry Rice in the 92 conference title game was a huge break for the Cowboys. The 49ers got several breaks in the 94 conference title game with three early turnovers. That’s what cost the Cowboys that game.
Different eras.

Who cares about your regular season stats if you could not get it done in the playoffs? Romo and Dak currently…

Who cares about your regular season stats if you won championships? Aikman and Roger

Aikman’s and Roger’s post season success > Romo’s and Dak’s regular season stats

5 SB rings > 0 rings.

It is about winning SBs.

What you should do is compare Aikman versus the top QB in his era and Romo and Dak versus the top QBs in their eras.

Aikman has the most SB wins than the top QBs of his era which include Young, Favre, and Elway. Montana was at the end of his career in the early 1990s.

He also got the best of Young, Favre, and Kelly for the most part during the playoffs.

Aikman was considered among the best QBs of his era.

Romo on the other hand lost to Rogers and Favre in the playoffs.

Dak lost to Rodgers in the playoffs too.

Based on Romo’s and Dak’s regular season stats; were they ever considered among the top 3 QBs of their eras?
 
Last edited:

Cowboys5217

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,345
Reaction score
11,597
various:
Jimmy's book was written about the pre-salary cap era.
When you could legit build super teams it was much harder to win with normal QBs.
Dak is as good as the QB who won the SB last year.
You can't claim he is as good as "x" if "x" has a ring while Dak hasn't even sniffed one.
 

BigD_95

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,009
Reaction score
2,013
After 7 years with Dak, I hold Jimmy's philosophy to be true. Dak will never get us to a SB, let alone win us one.

So, our fans aren't looking at a SB for another 4 or more years? Ugh


Dak didn’t need to be great - he just needed to not suck

Dak is too inconsistent to with 3 or 4 games in a row in the playoffs
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
61,618
Reaction score
38,980
Different eras.

Who cares about your regular season stats if you could not get it done in the playoffs? Romo and Dak currently…

Who cares about your regular season stats if you won championships? Aikman and Roger

Aikman’s and Roger’s post season success > Romo’s and Dak’s regular season stats

5 SB rings > 0 rings.

It is about winning SBs.

What you should do is compare Aikman versus the top QB in his era and Romo and Dak versus the top QBs in their eras.

Aikman has the most SB wins than the top QBs of his era which include Young, Favre, and Elway. Montana was at the end of his career in the early 1990s.

He also got the best of Young, Favre, and Kelly for the most part during the playoffs.

Aikman was considered among the best QBs of his era.

Romo on the other hand lost to Rogers and Favre in the playoffs.

Dak lost to Rodgers in the playoffs too.

Based on Romo’s and Dak’s regular season stats; were they ever considered among the top 3 QBs of their eras?
The rules have opened up the passing game and have perfected QBs. You have average QBs that have a higher career passer ratings than Hall of Fame QBs of the 70s, 80s and 90s. Romo and Dak were never considered amongst the top three QBs because of their lack of postseason success. Both had seasons where they passed for almost 5000 yards, but it led to nothing. Aikman was considered a top three QB despite never having big numbers because of his Super Bowl wins. His Super Bowl wins are why he’s in the Hall of Fame.
 
Top