superpunk
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,330
- Reaction score
- 75
This is fallacy. Kind of a red herring, maybe. "Give us names of who would make a better head coach." As though without a ready replacement his complaints are unfounded.Chocolate Lab;2345824 said:rcaldw, who is this young, fiery, next Noll/Shula/Jimmy coach you want?
Let's have some names.
It is not necessary to have a necessary replacement in mind to acknowledge that something is wrong with the incumbent. Not having a replacement in mind does not invalidate the argument.
Effectively what the red herring does is suggest that if no replacement is clearly in mind, well then Wade is the man. But is that really what defense of Wade boils down to? "Well, there aren't any better options that you can think of, are there?"
Hollow support, IMO.