JJT: Arrogant offseason approach has Cowboys at bottom of NFC

JoeBoBBY

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,631
Reaction score
1,691
How many yards do you think Murray has right now if he's on this Cowboys team says Romo all year?

The question is whether we should have paid Murray what the Eagles did.

The answer should be obvious.


I respectfully disagree. I do not think the answer is so obvious.

Despite what DM is doing in Philly(different system, coaches, role); Last year,for this team, the Dallas Cowboys, he ran for 1800 plus yards and , along with Romo, propelled the team to a 12-4 record. It was that running game, which helped the entire team. It was an attitude, a culture, an identity, which the entire team and organization bought into, and fed offf of......

Of course he wouldnt have done as well, if Romo had been hurt last year. ---- Would we have won some games with DM back there this year? ---- I dont think there is any real way to determine that. I would be inclined to think we would have. Obviously, the Oline performed better with DM in the lineup. We have actual game film to prove that. Actual results that cant be disputed away by , "Well Romo was rusty for the Carolina game...so that why..." etc etc etc.

We proved that DM would work in our system, with our Oline and our QB.

Was it worth his contract that he got in Philly at a chance to for an NFCE crown? --- I dunno, im not a salary cap, contract guy. I guess that depends on how much emphasis you put on actual results vs projected results, and well, winning. - winning within Romos timeframe.
 
Last edited:

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,405
Reaction score
10,074
How many yards do you think Murray has right now if he's on this Cowboys team says Romo all year?

The question is whether we should have paid Murray what the Eagles did.

The answer should be obvious.

If Murray was still in Dallas he would have been in on that 2nd down play where Romo got pummeled. Thus he would have been blocking or running the ball. Therefore, Romo would possibly NOT be injured. He would probably NOT be as effective as last year but enough to where defenses has to account for the run - taking pressure off of Romo. So YES Murray would still have been a valuable here.

Garrett talks about RKG and its the type of football player we want on the team. Murray was RKG and a team player. Yet we DIDN'T try to resign him. He wanted to come back here.

Maybe, just maybe, if the Cowboys tried to resign him and made an effort in doing so, maybe for a little more than their measly below the market price average, Murray would have resigned.
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
If Murray was still in Dallas he would have been in on that 2nd down play where Romo got pummeled. Thus he would have been blocking or running the ball. Therefore, Romo would possibly NOT be injured. He would probably NOT be as effective as last year but enough to where defenses has to account for the run - taking pressure off of Romo. So YES Murray would still have been a valuable here.

Garrett talks about RKG and its the type of football player we want on the team. Murray was RKG and a team player. Yet we DIDN'T try to resign him. He wanted to come back here.

Maybe, just maybe, if the Cowboys tried to resign him and made an effort in doing so, maybe for a little more than their measly below the market price average, Murray would have resigned.

Romo got hurt last year with Murray on the team.

Try again.
 

Bullet22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
477
Arrogant offseason approach has Cowboys at bottom of NFC
39m
i

Jean-Jacques Taylor, ESPN Staff Writer

IRVING, Texas -- The Dallas Cowboys find themselves in last place in the NFC East and tied for the worst record in the NFC because they took an arrogant approach to the offseason.
It was easy to do because they finished 12-4 and won the division behind the game’s best offensive line in 2014. DeMarco Murray produced a franchise-record 1,845 rushing yards and Tony Romo had never played better when it mattered most.

And that’s why they believed their own hype.

The Cowboys pride themselves on making decisions collectively, so you can blame the quartet of owner/general manager Jerry Jones, vice president Stephen Jones, head coach Jason Garrett and scouting director Will McClay in any order you choose.

Brandon Weeden the Cowboys’ backup quarterback, because it’s obvious Garrett and offensive coordinator Scott Linehan had zero confidence in Weeden.

They gave him a Pop Warner game plan, then wondered why he didn’t produce before demoting him as starter after three winless starts. Matt Cassel, Weeden’s replacement, was acquired the week Romo broke his collarbone and the Cowboys knew they would need a starter for nearly two months.

Cassel has a 1-5 record as a starter, with five touchdowns, six interceptions and a 73.5 passer rating overall this season. He has flunked a quarterback’s most important job, which is getting the team into the end zone.

The Cowboys have scored one touchdown or less in four of his six starts. Pathetic.
A lot of the Cowboys’ offensive issues besides the obvious absence of Romo can be traced to the team's negotiating tactics with Murray. Clearly, the Cowboys were afraid of his age and his workload, which included more than 400 touches in 2014, so there was no way they were going to give him the five-year, $40 million deal he received from Philadelphia.

Matching Philadelphia’s deal wasn’t the problem. The Cowboys never really gave Murray a legitimate offer until free agency began. Everybody knows that if you allow a player to reach unrestricted free agency, the odds of him returning are virtually nil.

The Cowboys figured their offensive line was so good that even Joseph Randle, released after Week 6, and a running back by committee could get the job done.

They haven’t.

The running game may rank in the top half of the NFL, but it has been unreliable all season. The Cowboys have struggled in short-yardage situations and haven't controlled games with their running game the way they did last season.

The inconsistent running game has affected their ability to be productive with play-action passes and their deep passing game. See, it all works together.

Ignore the stats, which say the Cowboys have rushed for a 4.4 average on 346 carries and Darren McFadden has 798 yards and a 4.2 yards-per-carry average. If you’ve watched the games, you know the truth: They miss Murray -- or somebody like him.

The Cowboys eschewed selecting a runner in the best running back draft in years last spring, but it’s clear they need a starter. McFadden has been solid, but this team needs more than that because it wants a dominant running game.

In the process, the Cowboys have found out this line isn’t so good that anyone can gain 1,300 yards running behind it. You could not convince them of that last spring.

http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas-cowb...fseason-approach-has-cowboys-at-bottom-of-nfc

They miss Romo or someone like him, and a healthy Dez....DMC is not the problem....Murray is so good, he is 4th string in Philly...
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Unless Murray could switch to quarterback, wide receiver or defense, not re-signing him has had very little effect on our season.

If you want to know what this season would have been like with Murray, just go watch last season's game against Arizona -- but take away the pick-six from our defense.
 
Top