I dont neceassirly disagree with letting Murray walk, becuase of the money. But the plan to replace him shouldve been thought out better. I have to beleive, that they really really thought the answer was JRandle/DMC or Dunbar\Williams stepping up to take the position. They passed on CJ. oooops. They passed on some guys in the third round. oooops.
My argument is why? Why take that risk, at this particualr time in Romos career? Do they have another franchise QB that can get us to the Super Bowl and just not letting anybody know about him? Okay fine, you think you have something with the OL and you think you have something with Randle or maybe DMC steps up.......but are you so certain about that, that your willing to roll the dice on it. Its not like we were desperate? We had finally found something that worked , besides letting Romo chuck it 40 odd times a game. We had been successfull with what was in place......; Why ......................change that???? Why mess with it? Why take that gamble , when, I didnt think they had too......
Murray was home grown. Drafted by us. He was ours. How about we keep ours? But I get it, RBs dime a dozen, great OL, money.... I just wouldve rolled the dice with Murray or an expensive replacement. Or, at least drafted one. Thats the gamble I think shouldve been made. Not Randle\DMC. Williams dunbar Cmike, gus johnson....etc etc etc...
I wouldve re-committed to the running game. Romo wouldve been handing balls off so much , untouched, he wouldve got bored during the games.
It worked. It was working.......................?