Having an impact on one player and one position, even if a vital position, does not equate to head coach material. That's especially true given that this season as the QB coach is his first ever as an NFL coach.
yeh you're right in it, being a quality position coach such as a QB coach, alone into being a suitable HC material.
But yet we've seen it happen around the league with guys like John Harbaugh, Sean McVay, Doug Pederson, Frank Reich
..guys that were QB coaches, offensive assistants, etc. before an inquiring teams interviewed them, obviously inspired by the interview and took a chance on them.
My question with Kitna into HC, would be the same sense I thought with Kellen Moore (and his media-driven HC consideration) - overall coaching experience.
Both guys are only going through their new, very first NFL level coaching position experience, and would teams gamble on that kind of inexperience novice so fast with their troubled teams ?
Certain things you won’t find out until these assistant coaches turned HCs hit the ground running with their new teams.
- It's more to it with head coaching than X's and O's and individual technical work.:
-I think HC's have to be smart and knowledgeable enough to oversee the entire operation, in all three areas of their teams.
- they have to prove themselves game managers and leaders of men.
- they have to prove themselves as inspiring motivators to keep their team fighting and competiting hard -especially when adversity comes in and going gets tough
(significant injury losses, losing streak, off field distractions, etc)
- they have to know when to delegate responsibility among their staff, knowing when to let his assts. lead.. and when it comes time when the HC himself has to be assertive,
take charge and lead themselves when the situation and task demands it,
- they also have to have good connections around the league, in who/how to find the more suitable assts, coordinators to carry out the duties demanded.