News: Joseph Randle's attorney issues statement addressing ex-girlfriend's allegations

[jrumann59]

IF he broke a window on her car he would have been arrested on a DV charge. he was charged for drug possession so the window either got broke later or the window is not broken.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

IF he broke a window on her car he would have been arrested on a DV charge. he was charged for drug possession so the window either got broke later or the window is not broken.

She reported it the next day. She failed to mention the kid getting shattered glass all over him and the heroic actions of her 'friend' to the cops that showed up to her distress call.

 

[Nightman]

I love how you continue to speak with certainty that he is guilty. The cops were there after the supposed 'threat' took place. You still hanging your hat on her not saying anything because she was afraid?

Get a grip. I never once said he was guilty. I am just presenting the story she provided the cops, you know the reason the story exists in the first place. Sorry if I don't put 'allegedly' after every word just to appease for sense of internet justice.

You sound like his lawyer, who supplied "He is innocent of all charges" line. Really, is that you believe???? You don't say...

 

[Nightman]

She reported it the next day. She failed to mention the kid getting shattered glass all over him and the heroic actions of her 'friend' to the cops that showed up to her distress call.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Get a grip. I never once said he was guilty. I am just presenting the story she provided the cops, you know the reason the story exists in the first place. Sorry if I don't put 'allegedly' after every word just to appease for sense of internet justice.

You sound like his lawyer, who supplied "He is innocent of all charges" line. Really, is that you believe???? You don't say...

You get a grip. I never said that you did. You do speak of her allegations as if they were fact and you have for days now. You don't qualify that it's coming from her. You can say that i sound like an attorney but you writing like that is a rhetorical device that lawyers do use. Notice how his attorney spoke in certain declarations?

Introspection is important.

 

[Nightman]

You get a grip. I never said that you did. You do speak of her allegations as if they were fact and you have for days now. You don't qualify that it's coming from her. You can say that i sound like an attorney but you writing like that is a rhetorical device that lawyers do use. Notice how his attorney spoke in certain declarations?

Introspection is important.

Believe what you want. I can't convince you that I don't believe her and I don't believe him. I do believe that articles were written about the incident and I have relayed what was written and what she accused him of.

If you can't handle those truths I don't know what to tell you.

 

[Nightman]

I love how you continue to speak with certainty that he is guilty. The cops were there after the supposed 'threat' took place. You still hanging your hat on her not saying anything because she was afraid?

You seemed confused as to the timing of her going to the hotel and the restraining order. She didn't file the order until AFTER the fight at the hotel.

She said there was a gun and one of his friends left with it before the police got there. That's all I know. The window being busted out seems easy enough to confirm.

He asked about why she would file a restraining order and then go to his hotel. That is not how it happened.

She went to his hotel. An argument ensued. She called the police. THEN she filed the abuse order.

I'm not making any assumptions. I'm just relaying things she said. You have made up your mind to disregard everything she has said. That's fine, it's your prerogative. Just don't tell me what I read isn't real. I'm not making anything up.

I don't know what I'm missing here. You were implying that she went to his room so she shouldn't be able to get a restraining order.

But the argument happened at the hotel room. Then he waved a gun and broke a window, allegedly.

She didn't know BEFORE going to the room he would get that crazy. She filed the abuse order AFTER he did all these things because she was now afraid of him.

She says she was threatened with the gun after her friends were asked to leave his room. He supposedly waved the gun around and threatened to shoot up the car and allegedly broke out the window in her car with their baby inside as she was leaving.

I'm not confused at all. I only repeated what has been reported on the news. It was very clearly stated by the woman that Randle had a gun and broke the car window. She even said glass got in the babies hair. It may not be true, but that is exactly what she claimed happened.

He supposedly followed her out to the parking lot after she sent her friend and child out to the car. If he waved a gun, smashed the window and threatened her that would be more than enough to grant a temporary order. There is supposedly a full hearing set for Feb 19th to see if it still has merit or should be revoked.

I don't know why people are having such a hard time even entertaining the idea that Randle may have done these things after the extraordinary lack of character and intelligence he showed in the shoplifting case.

but it would surprise me more if he was completely innocent.

 

[xwalker]

Once again there is more mess to this kid. But his fan club will come to his defense.

No, most people "defending" him are people that believe in due process. Lynch mobs and witch burnings were a bad time in our history. Let's try not to repeat the same mentality.

 

[jrumann59]

No, most people "defending" him are people that believe in due process. Lynch mobs and witch burnings were a bad time in our history. Let's try not to repeat the same mentality.

Lets not forget we still live a society that when a man is accused of Rape or DV he is guilty until proven innocent.

 

[lostar2009]

No. Reasonable people want to see how this plays out before condemning him. If you cut every player who has ever got in some degree of trouble, Dez, Rolando McClain, Josh Brent, Anthony Spencer, Orlando Scandrick and several others would be playing for other teams now. As of now, the one charge that he was arrested for has been dropped, but some people want to run him up a tree for reasons that are unknown. Why would you even cut him now anyway? Is getting in trouble (and then having charges dropped) in the offseason really going to affect this team? How many games will be lost because Randle has a familial dispute? Tank the season if we don't cut him now, right?

Yeah you right there is nothing wrong with getting in trouble all the time. He was arrested last year and earlier this year. But hey if he get arrested again later in the year all is good unless the charges are drop right? I believe in due process but someone who is always in cuffs seem to be doing something wrong.

 

[lostar2009]

No, most people "defending" him are people that believe in due process. Lynch mobs and witch burnings were a bad time in our history. Let's try not to repeat the same mentality.

We should be able to trade him for a mid round pick this year and grab another rb. Let Dunbar get some reps.

 

[Alexander]

http://cowboysblog.***BANNED-URL***...ing-gun-marijuana-and-a-friend-bleeding.html/

 

[DFWJC]

http://blacksportsonline.com/home/2015/02/joseph-randles-ex-gf-says-he-offered-20k-to-have-abortion/

A complete low life.

Maybe so.
The dude is starting to sound like more trouble than he's worth.

But that his her account only, so I'd take it at that.

Can't say I'm a fan of abortion, but it is legal. Not saying that's the case, but for all we know, she set him up for extortion.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

We should be able to trade him for a mid round pick this year and grab another rb. Let Dunbar get some reps.

I'm just to the point that I am going to laugh at people because some arguments are so bad it's unnecessary to argue on merit.

 

[casmith07]

Here is the full statement from Gary Ayers, whose law firm is representing Randle:

“Joseph Randle regrets that he was recently involved in a party in a Wichita, Kansas hotel that ended with the Wichita Police being called. There are no criminal charges. A woman who was present at the party has filed a protection from abuse lawsuit, which Randle believes to have no merit. Randle asked the woman to leave the party and go home, which she refused to do.

Contrary to the woman’s allegations, Randle did not threaten her or brandish a gun at any time. Randle has retained counsel who will contact the Wichita police to offer cooperation with any further investigation they may want to conduct. Until that time, Randle has been advised by counsel to not discuss the incident. He very much appreciates the many statements of support from his family, friends, and fans.”


More: http://crimeblog.***BANNED-URL***/2...t-addressing-ex-girlfriends-allegations.html/

Bad lawyering, bro. Just come out and say the claim is without merit, period.

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Believe what you want. I can't convince you that I don't believe her and I don't believe him. I do believe that articles were written about the incident and I have relayed what was written and what she accused him of.

If you can't handle those truths I don't know what to tell you.

Well seeing that you only relay the portions of those reports that shed a negative light, i find your veracity wanting.

Your bias is obvious so quit fronting. Being circumspect when called on it does not mitigate the other times you speak with certainty.

And on final note, your decrying me as a 'lawyer' is gratuitous nonsense. We are arguing a legal question and I have never once claimed nor implied legal expertise. Frankly, it sounds petulant.

 

[speedkilz88]

Get a grip. I never once said he was guilty. I am just presenting the story she provided the cops, you know the reason the story exists in the first place. Sorry if I don't put 'allegedly' after every word just to appease for sense of internet justice.

You sound like his lawyer, who supplied "He is innocent of all charges" line. Really, is that you believe???? You don't say...

Funny (to me) you're the only one sounding like a lawyer, hers.

 

[Longboysfan]

He needed to call Hotel Security to have the young lady removed.

 

[Nightman]

Well seeing that you only relay the portions of those reports that shed a negative light, i find your veracity wanting.

Your bias is obvious so quit fronting. Being circumspect when called on it does not mitigate the other times you speak with certainty.

And on final note, your decrying me as a 'lawyer' is gratuitous nonsense. We are arguing a legal question and I have never once claimed nor implied legal expertise. Frankly, it sounds petulant.

After being called out and made to look silly, I didn't expect you to acknowledge it or apologize. I figured you would just slink away quietly. But to double down on the insults after getting publicly owned shows me you can't be reasoned with.

 

[Nightman]

Funny (to me) you're the only one sounding like a lawyer, hers.

Objection- You obviously didn't read post #47 above, so I move to strike your comment for the record.