Except you're not looking at this logically.
Randle was told something he shouldn't do, he did it. You are then expecting the coaches to trust him in a 3rd and 1 situation? I'm not agreeing with putting C-Mike in the game, I believe it should have been McFadden, but Randle was benched for good reason. He screwed up, he went over and argued with the coach, and that was it; he was benched.
Doesn't matter how much "playing time" he had throughout the season. Randle has shown throughout the season he slows down with the more carries he gets. He simply wasn't playing well, the RB that broke a long one went out with an injury.
Randle deserved to be benched, he deserves to continue riding the bench. He's a JAG, benching him doesn't hurt our football team.
Well I agree with what you say , but for that game he was the best choice to have in on the 3rd and one, and after that game bench him.
He should not have been the start all along, but it was the same coach that decided he was the right choice in the first place.
That was a close game, and since CM did not get even 1 yard, either randle or dmc should have ran that play.
Randle isnt a jag, the blocking has been terrible, and the playcalling , and the passing game, all of which affects the run game.
Not saying he is good, just he isnt as bad as it seems.
Maybe he should be benched, but not in that game.
Look at this set of images and you will see randle has no chance, poor play design, poor blocking.
if they are running to the left, it is stupid to have witten on the right, and escobar on the left is it not?
Also martin does not help at all on the play, the guy he should have blocked is the one who makes the tackle, as free had to try and
get in front of him but couldnt.
for big size
http://postimg.org/image/p18gxptop/
and I will post here too.