dlobell
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 360
- Reaction score
- 313
I hope you were kiddingAllen? Meh
Thank the lord we have Dak
I hope you were kiddingAllen? Meh
Thank the lord we have Dak
After the season opener for the Bills versus the Rams and their second game versus the Titans, people on this board praised Josh Allen as if he could never do any wrong barring injury.
I am just curious if after that 18 of 34 for 205, 2 pick game he lost yesterday against a team who was a double digit division underdog, I wonder if those people feel the same way about ole Josh today.
Dare I say it but what if Dak did the same against the G-Giants, Eagles or Commanders given a similar situation. By the way, why isn't Aaron Rogers not elevating the players around him? I know Tom is old as hades and he has a plethora of skins on the wall, but it seems to me he's struggling mightily. Did you see that emotional hug between him and Leftwich after they squeaked out that win yesterday? All I'm saying is, winning in the NFL on a consistent level ain't as easy as the highly sometimes biased and negative talking points some of us make on this board.
My old coach told us after we lost to a much inferior team that lucky teams can beat a good team any day...he'd rather us give our all and be lucky and win, than to be good and lose. That always stuck with me....
Allen? Meh
Thank the lord we have Dak
Bills fans are going we haven't won a Super Bowl in 60 years and now Allen is hurt.I guarantee you Bills fans aren't going around saying "Ya know, Dak has bad games sometimes too" ...
I wonder why that is?
Well Allen is a wounded lion now and he doesn't feel good.There's only a handful of QBs in the NFL that aren't sheep when compared to a lion like Allen.
Dak isn't in that handful.
And you are a troll.Anybody that wouldn't isn't a Cowboys fan. They're just a Dak fan.
Ive also been attacked and called names and been wished harm...they dont care and allow it but censor me for being reasonable.
Its a desperate psychology trap hoping to trigger me.
Your old coach was wrong to teach you that.After the season opener for the Bills versus the Rams and their second game versus the Titans, people on this board praised Josh Allen as if he could never do any wrong barring injury.
I am just curious if after that 18 of 34 for 205, 2 pick game he lost yesterday against a team who was a double digit division underdog, I wonder if those people feel the same way about ole Josh today.
Dare I say it but what if Dak did the same against the G-Giants, Eagles or Commanders given a similar situation. By the way, why isn't Aaron Rogers not elevating the players around him? I know Tom is old as hades and he has a plethora of skins on the wall, but it seems to me he's struggling mightily. Did you see that emotional hug between him and Leftwich after they squeaked out that win yesterday? All I'm saying is, winning in the NFL on a consistent level ain't as easy as the highly sometimes biased and negative talking points some of us make on this board.
My old coach told us after we lost to a much inferior team that lucky teams can beat a good team any day...he'd rather us give our all and be lucky and win, than to be good and lose. That always stuck with me....
Josh Allen has exactly 0 championships and things are starting to go sour with the injury.Your old coach was wrong to teach you that.
It's how you play the game that matters. If you play it right you will win more than you lose.
And Dak hasn't played at Josh Allen's level. If Dak had a history of beating good teams and had a bad game, we'd figure things happen like that.
But Josh Allen will have more great games against good teams. Dak never has played at Allen's level.
That the difference.
I wonder if the Bills go 4-1 without Allen?Well Allen is a wounded lion now and he doesn't feel good.
Yep, they aren't as good as the Cowboys.I wonder if the Bills go 4-1 without Allen?
Doubt it. Because he matters.
Most fans don't watch other teams so they are ignorant. They see a full cowboy game and all Daks Good and Bad throws. They only see NFL highlights of the other QBs. I'm not a Dak hater or fanboy. He is what he is, a slightly above average QB and that to me is sufficient to get the job done. In comparison I think Josh Allen is better/more gifted than Dak. But I see things that Josh Allen gets away with (i.e. double clutching before a pass) that Dak can't. Because of arm strength Josh can double clutch and still the ball can get to where it needs to when it needs to. If Dak does that it goes behind the receiver.
I guarantee you Bills fans aren't going around saying "Ya know, Dak has bad games sometimes too" ...
I wonder why that is?
After the season opener for the Bills versus the Rams and their second game versus the Titans, people on this board praised Josh Allen as if he could never do any wrong barring injury.
I am just curious if after that 18 of 34 for 205, 2 pick game he lost yesterday against a team who was a double digit division underdog, I wonder if those people feel the same way about ole Josh today.
Dare I say it but what if Dak did the same against the G-Giants, Eagles or Commanders given a similar situation. By the way, why isn't Aaron Rogers not elevating the players around him? I know Tom is old as hades and he has a plethora of skins on the wall, but it seems to me he's struggling mightily. Did you see that emotional hug between him and Leftwich after they squeaked out that win yesterday? All I'm saying is, winning in the NFL on a consistent level ain't as easy as the highly sometimes biased and negative talking points some of us make on this board.
My old coach told us after we lost to a much inferior team that lucky teams can beat a good team any day...he'd rather us give our all and be lucky and win, than to be good and lose. That always stuck with me....
Exactly.Because they are secure …. unlike our Dak lovers
Josh Allen has exactly 0 championships and things are starting to go sour with the injury.
why do you think Allen is elite and Dak isn’t? That’s the simplest answer for the double standard. Football isn’t difficult to understand, nuance is. And i’m not sure you and nuance have been formally introduced