peplaw06;2304340 said:
The defense wasn't at all similar. We played good run defense against the Giants and got run over by the Skins.
And your point is? Surprised you have no stat here. Talk about baseless. Is this what you "saw"?
peplaw06;2304340 said:
Romo runs around the pocket all the time, hardly an indication we're going to lose.
Wrong. Romo's AND Garretts plan was for him to step UP into the pocket. When he can't, he scrambles. Which proves my point. He shouldn't be scrambling as much, which he did on Sunday, just like the Giants game last year. I also did NOT say it's why we lose. It's part of the big picture.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
Can you answer why we went away from the run in the Giants game? I can in the Skins game... because it wasn't working
B.S. WOW!!! a whole 11 times. Yeah that's proof. Maybe in hand grenade tossing. C'mon, Pep.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
Romo was seeing 8 man fronts, so he audibled out. It was obviously working against the Giants.
Again.........we out "stated" the Gints but LOST. Whoopie...........
peplaw06;2304340 said:
What did Toomer's catch have to do with anything? We scored at the end of the first half against the Skins.
Momentum and the lead. We were playing catch up because the Skin's came to play. We reverted to the lackluster Keystone cop, unorganized football we display in the playoffs. Sorry you can't see that.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
I'd be surprised if you even watched the games given the fact that you can't make a single valid comparison between the two losses.
Single my butt. I've pointed them out you refuse to hear it.
Re-read this post. You may want to go back and repeat in the mirror 10 times.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
You don't like stats? You'd rather throw out baseless comments based on what you "saw." Nevermind the fact that the stats (or facts) don't backup what you say you "saw." No... we'll just go off your gut or your opinion as to how the games played out.
Nooooo. We'll go off your stat machine and use the Giants as a example. Cowboys - better stats. Giants - Worse stats. Cowboys in stands watching Giants. Giants - WORLD CAHMPIONS. I cannot make it any more clear than that. Nevermind that the stats or your facts don't backup what you "believe".
peplaw06;2304340 said:
How many times was Romo sacked last week?
Who cares? How many passes were hurried and off target? That's kinda important too.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
I guess this last paragraph are the only comparisons you can actually make that mean anything... we lost, to a division rival, at home... wow. Guess that is a losing combination. Of course, we did beat Philly at home just the week prior to.
Whoa tiger. Just a couple sentences ago you stated I didn't have a SINGLE comparison AND you KNOW I said the Eagles game could've gone either way.
Your making my point for me. Thanks and all.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
If you thought that this was a championship caliber team before and now you don't, the only way to explain that is that you're a knee-jerk reactionary.
Man, pep. You're reverting to putiing wordsinto my mouth? Sad, sad day. SHOW ME where I said I thought I thought this team was of championship caliber. I dare you. You can't which makes your point all the less credible. Your grasping dude and you don't wear it well.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
Philly is a division rival too. And we didn't play that great against them on defense anyway.
I've already stated this in a previous post. Remember, I said the game could've gone either way? Thanks for para-phrasing tho.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
But the offense played great so we won. I didn't see you in here saying we weren't championship caliber then.
Again, you know why because I TOLD YOU in a previous post. I usually don't post until several days after a game. Can I get you a sports drink? Power bar?
peplaw06;2304340 said:
The Washington game could have gone either way too. That onsides kick gets caught by Hurd, and we have a Buffalo repeat.
Hurd didn't. So what? Has absolutely NO bearing on my opinion with HOW we lost. Next.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
Were we not in control of the Cleveland game?
You wanna talk Cleveland or do you want to talk about my Washington game opinion?
And no, I thought we had alot of luck with dropped passes by Cleveland and we ahd the first game bugs like everybody else.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
And if you can "control" half of your games in the NFL, and win half of the games your not "in control," then I bet you'll have a pretty good win percentage.
Um, dude. That's 50% by my math. We going 8-8?
peplaw06;2304340 said:
And chuckle at winning in a "Pro-football fashion." Does that mean leading at the end of the game as opposed to outscoring them? Again you can't point to anything specific, you just spit out cliches like we were "running around with chickens like our heads cut off...." That despite the fact that we had 300 yards passing and only 3 penalties. Come on man... you put forth the opinion that this was a typical loss for us. Tell us how, specifically.
Yet another useless stat. We LOST. We looked like we didn't know what we were doing. Stat that, jack.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
This is a diversion from the point at hand. I'm not arguing that we have won recent meaningful post-season games. The point was yours, that we lost in the same fashion. Guess we lost in a pro-football fashion.
Thanks for sharin'?
peplaw06;2304340 said:
You see no change.... In what respect are the losses the same? How are teams going to approach us now? I mean if these are carbon copy losses, then there must be a specific blueprint for beating us...
Wrong again, honey. IF we play our game, (which we're not,my point) then we roll. They can look at all the film they want. NO such thing as a blueprint for good teams that play to their potential. Again, it's not that we lost its HOW we lost. Say it alot, slowly.
peplaw06;2304340 said:
Do you have to be a division rival playing in Texas stadium? If so, that doesn't really sound like a blueprint.
WTH are you talking about? You said blueprint. I didn't. You're scaring me now.............
peplaw06;2304340 said:
Is it holding Barber under 100 yards? The Giants didn't do that. Is it holding Romo under 300 yards passing? The Skins didn't do that. So what is it? Make us commit penalties? We only had 3 last week.
Stats. Good Lord. If you can't tell the difference between the way we played and the way we should play, then I'm not sure anyone can help you. We haven't changed one iota, thus far, form the end of last year. Washington is a lesser team, IMO and we continue to let teams like that slap us around. Should not happen.