Hostile
The Duke
- Messages
- 119,565
- Reaction score
- 4,544
I NEVER said you don't root for Dallas to win. I said you care less about that than you do thumping your own chest. There is a difference.Nors said:Thats 100% not correct. I root for Dallas to win. But to not address a GLARING weakness demands and deserves scrutiny. Just like not addressing RCB and FS last year daggered this team.
Luckily the glaring holes are significantly less this year after FA and draft. Last years scrubs are quickly being replaced! Gurode, Singleton, RCB circus act, DE, NT, smurf LB's being snuffed. Change is good and NEEDED, STILL at FS.
Law still unsigned - Fact!
I agree with you 100% on the glaring hole demanding scrutiny. I never said I didn't. Nor did anyone else. People on here discuss FS every day. You're just upset because no one thinks you idea is realistic. Boo hoo.
The solution you are offering, and get upset about when no one jumps on your teeter totter, is one that simply has too many flaws to seriously consider.
1. Law is not a FS and FS is our glaring need. There is no proof he could excell at FS or even help at FS. I know you though. If we struggle at FS you're going to tell everyone how right you were all along. There will be no proof to support you at all and you'll thump your chest like King Kong. We have RCB last year as proof.
2. Jerry and Bill do not want to cap strap the team for coming years while Law is on record as saying he thinks he will be the best CB in the NFL in 2005 and deserves to be recognized as such. In other words he wants to receive Champ Bailey type of money not the "Parcells friendly deal" that has not been offered and won't be. Your perfect scenario was hatched in Fantasyland while everyone else is talking about the real world and what solutions are available.
I don't know many who think FS isn't an issue. Most here agree that it is. They've been charitable to your Law sermon so far but they are tiring of it because there's nothing new or relevant.