irishline
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,523
- Reaction score
- 3,802
They should just go back to the old rules and have all the players wear those big inflatable Sumo wrestler suits.
They should just go back to the old rules and have all the players wear those big inflatable Sumo wrestler suits.
It seems like they're trying to save the kickoff somehow instead of eliminating it altogether. Not sure it will work. There is a lot of potential strategy to the kickoff, not the least of which is the onsides kick. Especially the surprise variety you see sometimes early in games. The kickoff needs to stay.
Well, lucky for me that I enjoy European Football. Go AFC Bournemouth!
Won’t keep Austin from fumbling. Lol
Just quit screwing with the game.
That’s my feeling as well. Just pick a year between 1970 and 1999, adopt the rule book from that year, make it mandatory for every player to sign a waiver in order to play in the league, and tell the left wing loonies trying to kill the game to pound sand. Problem solved. Make the NFL great again. Sounds like a movement ready to happen.
I don’t think it makes on side kicks harderThanks for the facts.
1) and 3) are countervailing changes. One makes it harder for coverage, one makes it harder for the return. I'm not sure which side gets the better end of that deal.
2) is fine. Just cuts down on returns, but doesn't change the returns that do happen.
What I definitely don't like is that 1) makes onside kicks harder. Could actually be significantly harder. I wonder if they actually *tested* that out at all.
Definitely think they need to keep kickoffs. Otherwise, it starts to seem like a scrimmage. "Ok, it's your turn now, here's the ball on the 25."
Most was fielding puntsAs I have read, his fumbling, oddly enough, was totally to be found in the punting returns and not for the kickoffs. Go figure.
Totally agree.I don't think they really want that.
What about onside kicks? What about those critical holding calls that back teams up inside the 10, or muffed catches that result in bad field position? What about that high kickoff in Philly a few years ago in the wind that led to a Cowboys recovery? What about exciting returns for touchdowns? What about those costly kicks out of bounds that take the ball out to the 40?
Too much of the game is lost by just putting it at the 25-yard line, even though so many are kicked off for touchbacks. When the elements kick in, things get unpredictable. That shouldn't be lost.
Attention Tavon Austin, and all Cowboys headed for the kickoff teams.
The kickoff continues to be tweaked. New this year:
1. Kickoff coverage guys can no longer get a running start. They now have to line up within one yard of the 35-yard line. (This helps the return game.)
2. Kickoffs will be ruled touchbacks the second they hit the end zone on the ground. (Makes sense to avoid unnecessary hits on blocks upfield.)
3. No more 2 or 3 man blocking wedges to double-team guys. (This helps coverage units.)
It seems like they're trying to save the kickoff somehow instead of eliminating it altogether. Not sure it will work. There is a lot of potential strategy to the kickoff, not the least of which is the onsides kick. Especially the surprise variety you see sometimes early in games. The kickoff needs to stay.
Meanwhile, perhaps this could be good for Austin if the coverage guys are a little slower getting downfield.
elite returners are going to have a field day with this
I don’t think it makes on side kicks harder
Just different
But it opens up more of the field with fewer people to cover itMakes it harder.
Takes away the option that they currently think is the easiest to win, because that is the option they currently choose to take.
Most was fielding punts
Everyone last year were muffed punts
Solution, don’t put him back returning punts
Kick offs if muffed you still have time to recover and his speed could be dangerous
I suspect Beasley will be returning punts
Does anyone else have return experience?
It shouldn't be lost, but sadly I think the writing is on the wall.I don't think they really want that.
What about onside kicks? What about those critical holding calls that back teams up inside the 10, or muffed catches that result in bad field position? What about that high kickoff in Philly a few years ago in the wind that led to a Cowboys recovery? What about exciting returns for touchdowns? What about those costly kicks out of bounds that take the ball out to the 40?
Too much of the game is lost by just putting it at the 25-yard line, even though so many are kicked off for touchbacks. When the elements kick in, things get unpredictable. That shouldn't be lost.
Powerful insightfulness relayed @erod ,,,how can one ever discount the omnipresent threat of the onsides kick?,,,great food for the thoughts process of the short sighted footballish brain trust thats currently lowering the leagues altitudeAttention Tavon Austin, and all Cowboys headed for the kickoff teams.
The kickoff continues to be tweaked. New this year:
1. Kickoff coverage guys can no longer get a running start. They now have to line up within one yard of the 35-yard line. (This helps the return game.)
2. Kickoffs will be ruled touchbacks the second they hit the end zone on the ground. (Makes sense to avoid unnecessary hits on blocks upfield.)
3. No more 2 or 3 man blocking wedges to double-team guys. (This helps coverage units.)
It seems like they're trying to save the kickoff somehow instead of eliminating it altogether. Not sure it will work. There is a lot of potential strategy to the kickoff, not the least of which is the onsides kick. Especially the surprise variety you see sometimes early in games. The kickoff needs to stay.
Meanwhile, perhaps this could be good for Austin if the coverage guys are a little slower getting downfield.