Tampa? Again? Beating losers is what we do. When we have to play REAL adept playoff games...we get whipped.
It really doesn't.
Lance might be getting the Tony Romo treatment. Can't make it look like we might have a better QB on the roster.
Taking a young QB on a 4th, most certainly is NOT flushing....if it is..then it's like almost every other draft pick spot.
Really hard to believe people are making THIS the line in the sand for Jerry Football. Did we already forget drafting and extending Jaylon Smith?
Oh, how damn funny that others have to fall back on beating a geriatric QB on a bad team that should never of been in the playoffs. These jokers will do anything to try and elevate the Dakster. How embarrassing! lol.Tampa? Again? Beating losers is what we do. When we have to play REAL adept playoff games...we get whipped.
Tampa was so bad many called for losing teams to be exempted form automatic bids.
"bu bu but BRADYYYYYYY!" right?
They feel that Lance is better than a current 2nd round pick. We should see that in preseason play and they will probably make an offer to him for a contract extension.
They think that they do have a player. It will be fun watching him play in preseason.
like I said, let your spin begin...on cue!Tampa? Again? Beating losers is what we do. When we have to play REAL adept playoff games...we get whipped.
Tampa was so bad many called for losing teams to be exempted form automatic bids.
"bu bu but BRADYYYYYYY!" right?
Doesn't mean Lance is staying either.
That’s the plan? That’s the Cowboys’ plan? Wasn’t that the 49ers’ plan? The Cowboys don’t have a plan to even get him on the field. If Dak is not in the Cowboys’ future why don’t they cut him and get Lance in a game? If he’s the “plan” when do the Cowboys intend to execute the plan? The fact is the Cowboys have no plan. They know what Dak did last season and can’t decide what they’re going to do with him. But, you’re saying they know that a guy who has started four games in three years is going to be their starting quarterback? That’s what you’re suggesting? Are you serious or being sarcastic?
Here's the deal, rather Lance lights it up or duds, he will take Dak's place for a year at least. Dak is at the top of his earning bracket, but he isn't a difference maker. He's good, but he isn't a quarter of the salary cap good. Younger cheaper options would and should be sought after, beginning with Trey, if he isn't decent, draft one or two until you do. With the salary cap, and the lack of great quarterbacks available, the new way is going to be build a great team, and find young cheaper QBs.
They skipped the 5th year which would be a lot of money. They can have him for a much cheaper new deal. Because nobody expects him to play this year and so he wont be able to up his market value.
Well i dont know what our plan is. And i agree with you: i dont know about our plan because in reality the Joneses have no real plan at QB.
I think that is easy to answer. Dak keeps us in competition during meaningless games and so in the media. What the Joneses cant afford is a tanking season, be like 3-14. The risk is high if you cut Prescott and let an unproven QB start.
No problem.
Backup QB with slight potential for a starting role. Easily and cheap to extend beyond 24. Competition for your starting QB. Leverage in contract talks with Dak.
I don't mind a 4th, doesn't really matter all that much. In essence, we gave up a 4th for a 1 1/2 yr backup. I don't mind that much if that's the story. However, if he can't beat out Rush, then the trade doesn't make sense.
