Lance: 5th Year Option Declined

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
98,191
Reaction score
101,635
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
What a wasted 4th rounder. Thank you Jerry for being a fool.
Cowboys had a 2nd round grade on him and he went high in the 1st. He plays the most important position in all of sports. It was just a 4th rounder to get him. Seems like a pretty reasonable cost. If he turns out to be a player it was worth it. If he doesn't, it was just a 4th. Draft picks are about acquiring talent. Yes Jerry is a fool but I don't see how trading for Lance proves it.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,877
Reaction score
18,077
Yaawn. Nobody said he has to win games all by himself. But his contribution has been insufficient every time we faced a fairly capable opponent. And that's the elephant in the room. Heck I wouldn't say a damn thing against a contract extension if he had played good in at least one of the play off losses over the last three years. Or ever.
seattle? Tampa? let your spins begin
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
98,191
Reaction score
101,635
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
This is showing all the signs of being another example of Jerry being unable to resist what he perceives as a shiny toy, and the franchise being set back because of it.
The franchise is set back because of it??????? No. That's being dramatic.

This is just a single drop in the ocean of reasons why the Cowboys could be set back in the future.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,877
Reaction score
18,077
Cowboys had a 2nd round grade on him and he went high in the 1st. He plays the most important position in all of sports. It was just a 4th rounder to get him. Seems like a pretty reasonable cost. If he turns out to be a player it was worth it. If he doesn't, it was just a 4th. Draft picks are about acquiring talent. Yes Jerry is a fool but I don't see how trading for Lance proves it.
not a reasonable cost. why? he was 3rd stringer on the team. people come up with the excuse of he joined us 2 weeks before start of season. ok, then he couldn't take away the back up job by mid season? if he is a 1st round talent? or even a 2nd round talent? he couldn't take away back up duties from an UDFA, who is limited and been cut multiple times. and then cowboys refuse to pick up his 5th year option. which makes 2024 essentially his last year here and he is going to be what? at best Dak's back up....if they had faith in him they would have picked up the 5th. they have seen him for a year now and know what they have.

so why throw away a 4th round pick? and if they had a 2nd round grade on him, prior to draft. what was their evaluation after watching him play in the NFL? that's the tape that matters.
 

Cowboys5217

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,701
Reaction score
8,360
The franchise is set back because of it??????? No. That's being dramatic.

This is just a single drop in the ocean of reasons why the Cowboys could be set back in the future.
Well, if you think you can just flush draft picks down the toilet without consequence that's on you. I disagree strongly with that philosophy.

Yes, blowing 4th round draft picks can and do set teams back.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,324
Reaction score
7,184
Cowboys had a 2nd round grade on him and he went high in the 1st. He plays the most important position in all of sports. It was just a 4th rounder to get him. Seems like a pretty reasonable cost. If he turns out to be a player it was worth it. If he doesn't, it was just a 4th. Draft picks are about acquiring talent. Yes Jerry is a fool but I don't see how trading for Lance proves it.
It turned out to be a lower 4th. Jerry obviously gambled on the team being good enough to only sacrifice that. My guess is other teams offered a 5th and so that’s why JJ went up to a 4th. This idea that Trey only garnered a 6th or 7th is just as speculative, and contradicts what Lynch said. After Trey requested a trade, a few days after Lynch said the phones were ringing and he was surprised for the demand which was greater than he expected from other teams. My guess is that it started out with a likely high 6th, some teams moved to a 5th, and then JJ decided to up the ante to a 4th and so got the deal. It’s not even close to being a bad deal despite all the open and closet Dak-stans pretending “woe is the team”, like the lost draft pick and money means something to them and was a huge sacrifice on their end. He was drafted in 2021 and injured for a significant amount of time, is going to be 24 this month, and was considered a high 2nd round pick by the Dallas draft team. Even if it’s more likely he may not work out than he will, in the grand scheme of even just NFL things, a 4th round pick lost and millions of dollars out of JJ’s pocketbook means nothing. JJ’s made far worse gambles and trades, and it’s the 49ers who lost way more in terms of money and draft capital.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,491
Reaction score
19,237
he has played. there was tape. there was NFL scouting on him. should not have traded. rumor is other teams were at best offering low 5s....Jerry had to win this hand.
and it is wasted. he was 3rd stringer. lets give him excuses why he couldn't unseat Rush a very limited QB. then his 5th year option didn't get picked up. which means this is his last year, playing behind Dak.
so we traded a 4th rounder, for a 3rd stringer.....AWSOME
The trade made little sense if Jerry gives Dak a new contract after this season. But we don't know where Jerry is going with this. He may let Dak walk for all we know.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,877
Reaction score
18,077
The trade made little sense if Jerry gives Dak a new contract after this season. But we don't know where Jerry is going with this. He may let Dak walk for all we know.
he may let Dak walk. but he is starter in 2024. and neither of them are under contract in 2025. that's why the trade was stupid.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,491
Reaction score
19,237
he may let Dak walk. but he is starter in 2024. and neither of them are under contract in 2025. that's why the trade was stupid.
That doesn't mean they can't retain him for 2025. All they have to do is be the team with the best offer. Which won't cost much. They might work something out before the season starts.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
36,025
Reaction score
13,683
No, nothing in the last year and a half. Holding a clip board does not translate. He did not even lead our Scout Team offense.
You mean the 49'er scout team, huh? You reveal yourself every time you post. Yeah, you are in a Trance, 49'er fan.

I saw when you joined and now you dog our great QB's? Busted! Plus, having me on ignore was the best thing you did, because you are getting exposed for the fraud you are.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,604
Reaction score
4,439
https://www.si.com/nfl/cowboys/trey-lance-contract-5th-year-option

Makes it official…

Well, this should get interesting.

Welcome to reality…2 qb’s for 2024, then…time will tell
He could not show enough running the scout team to get a extension or 5th year. Maybe a waste of a 4th round pick, may get franchised next year, or will be a FA 2025 sign for another team.

I think any agent worth his commission would stay to be a QB for America's Team vs. any other team even as a back up.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
16,877
Reaction score
65,009
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Anyway we could get Jerry’s 36th year as GM option declined?
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,877
Reaction score
18,077
That doesn't mean they can't retain him for 2025. All they have to do is be the team with the best offer. Which won't cost much. They might work something out before the season starts.
they had and option to retain. they declined the option. can they retain him? yes, if they compete with anybody else that may want him.
if he did good, then market price goes up. and you would have had a cheaper option.
if he sucks, then cheaper, but it doesn't solve the QB problem.

eitherway it looks like a stupid trade.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,491
Reaction score
19,237
they had and option to retain. they declined the option. can they retain him? yes, if they compete with anybody else that may want him.
if he did good, then market price goes up. and you would have had a cheaper option.
if he sucks, then cheaper, but it doesn't solve the QB problem.

eitherway it looks like a stupid trade.
Picking up his option was never going to happen under any circumstances. Declining the option tells us nothing about whether or not they want to keep him. All it means is that they don't want to pay 20M for him. They can pick him up cheap in FA if he wants to stay.
 

dupree89

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,098
Reaction score
2,164
Cowboys had a 2nd round grade on him and he went high in the 1st. He plays the most important position in all of sports. It was just a 4th rounder to get him. Seems like a pretty reasonable cost. If he turns out to be a player it was worth it. If he doesn't, it was just a 4th. Draft picks are about acquiring talent. Yes Jerry is a fool but I don't see how trading for Lance proves it.
I think I gotta agree. He may very well turn out to be nothing. But a 4th rounder isnt the end of the world. Would it have been nice to have a 4th this year for a RB? Sure. But I think it's worth the gamble.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,877
Reaction score
18,077
Picking up his option was never going to happen under any circumstances. Declining the option tells us nothing about whether or not they want to keep him. All it means is that they don't want to pay 20M for him. They can pick him up cheap in FA if he wants to stay.
if he was good and had a future, they would have picked up the option. if he was top 10ish potential, then paying 25M would have been a great value for cowboys. that salary would put him top 17 in the league. a bargain these days.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,051
Reaction score
47,852
Cowboys had a 2nd round grade on him and he went high in the 1st. He plays the most important position in all of sports. It was just a 4th rounder to get him. Seems like a pretty reasonable cost. If he turns out to be a player it was worth it. If he doesn't, it was just a 4th. Draft picks are about acquiring talent. Yes Jerry is a fool but I don't see how trading for Lance proves it.
Yeah, this move was simply not that much of a stretch. The 4th is where you start taking chances on players anyway.
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,051
Reaction score
47,852
if he was good and had a future, they would have picked up the option. if he was top 10ish potential, then paying 25M would have been a great value for cowboys. that salary would put him top 17 in the league. a bargain these days.
Yup, but as per usual, we refused to play him to maybe get a glimpse.
 
Top