Lance Dunbar visiting 49ers

Pessimist_cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,900
Reaction score
15,272
Sorry if repost didn't see it. Wonder if Carlos Hyde is avaliable. Doesn't seem to fit chip jelly scheme .
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,709
Reaction score
17,370
Well....i hope we have a plan to replace the lone explosice player on the team...
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Well....i hope we have a plan to replace the lone explosice player on the team...

You mean, we might need to find a player as great as Dunbar?

Okay. Ervin in the draft.

Next.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Has there ever been as much pretend support for a player as you guys try to gin up over Lance Dunbar? And for no reason at all? I can't recall a similar case.
 

DTown214

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,814
Reaction score
2,887
If we weren't willing to give $7m AAV to Murray then we are certainly not going to give it to a draftpick. The price is controlled but last year the 4th pick got over $6m. The cap went up significantly.

Not if they think Elliott can be the better player. And the reason they didn't pay DeMarco was because he was already 27 at the time with a history of being injured a lot. Right now, if I had the option of taking a 20 year old Elliott or a 27 year old Murray for the same price, I'm taking Elliott all day every day. Maybe that's what the front office is thinking. Doesn't seem too outlandish to me.

Sorry for going off-topic in this thread.
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,509
Reaction score
26,396
Chip at work again trying to get our players away from us.

That's fine losing Dunbar may help push the front office in drafting a decent RB
 

coult44

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,876
Reaction score
7,653
The same folks who are saying leave Lance, are the same people who were saying him being hurt was a huge reason we lost last year!! Funny
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,017
Reaction score
76,722
If we weren't willing to give $7m AAV to Murray then we are certainly not going to give it to a draftpick. The price is controlled but last year the 4th pick got over $6m. The cap went up significantly.

They didn't want to give it to Murray because I'd wear and tear and his age.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,856
Not if they think Elliott can be the better player. And the reason they didn't pay DeMarco was because he was already 27 at the time with a history of being injured a lot. Right now, if I had the option of taking a 20 year old Elliott or a 27 year old Murray for the same price, I'm taking Elliott all day every day. Maybe that's what the front office is thinking. Doesn't seem too outlandish to me.

Sorry for going off-topic in this thread.

I'm going by what I think the Jones will actually do. Listening to Stephen talk about the position relative to the rest of the roster and Jerry talk about rookie contracts I just don't see them taking a shot at a rookie as opposed to the reigning NFC POTY.

If you like the player and want to dream don't let me stop you.

I personally think he is inferior to Gurley and about on par with Gordon from last year and not worth 4. After a trade down sure but, I would rather take Henry in the second or Smith in the third. I think Smith is a better blocker than Elliott. Henry has the power that Elliott lacks.
 
Top