ConstantReboot
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,232
- Reaction score
- 9,892
*** are you talking about you made the statement about Romo needing players to make plays and he didnt make them better, not true, but Dak does..not a knock on hi as its the same thing you said about Romo..however at this stage room was so far superior a natural passer then Dak its not even close..so witten made room and the whole team better seriously I bet you ask Jason about Romo and he would say he would not have been as successful with out Romo and vice versa but no way did all those TDs to dez and To happen because of Witten.. all those nonames who came through and became one hit wonders and left to again be nobodys..it was Romo making them better, if tyo cant see that your hate for Romo is off the charts..so how is it Romos career numbers Eclipse Aikmans and all the othersas an UDFA? just happen stance he got lucky he had Witten, thats your explanation.. all QB have their favorite go to guy and can be called a security blanket..Daks looked to be Beasly for one year and thats gone an now not any of the offense seem productive now..I like Dak but I also Loved Romo and he gets way too much disrespect..
We will have to disagree. Witten was already a talented TE when he was drafted. He was Romo's security blanket all this years. Thus when teams try to take that away from Romo it gave single coverage to receivers.
Your giving too much credit to Romo and not credit to skill players like Witten or even Bryant. I can't imagine how Romo would have faired all these years without Witten. And there is a reason why Witten was hard to replace.