Lavar Arrington

[InmanRoshi]

I don't care how he interviews, I'm not looking forward to watching our OL try to pick up Strahan and Osi and LA trying to get to Bledsoe. In fact, I want to barf just thinking about it. If Eli improves his play to become even a marginal QB, I would make them the hands down favorites for the NFC.

 

[StanleySpadowski]

Easily Arrington.

Owens is a better player but that isn't the question.

Arrington improves the Giants' defense more than Owens improves the Cowboys' offense. Regardless of whether he makes more than his fair share of bad plays, opponent's OCs still have to account for him on every play. If the Giants' secondary holds up, they'll have a dominant defense, I can't say the same about the Cowboys' offense despite adding Owens.




**Edit** Sorry, put this in the wrong thread. It goes in the Arrington/Owens Poll.

 

[CPnasty]

Whats funny about that is he had a radio interview today in the DC area and he said that he changed his # to 55 so he could move on from "his" fans that are still attached to him. Just being the primadonna he always has been. BTW, in case yall didn't know, the Giants retired #56 a while ago. This man is full of schitt!!!

welcome to the Lavar BS, we use to it by now

 

[WV Cowboy]

Easily Arrington.

Owens is a better player but that isn't the question.

Arrington improves the Giants' defense more than Owens improves the Cowboys' offense.

That is interesting, because I think TO improves everybody on the offense when he is on the field, ... QB, OL, RB, WR, TE.

I didn't see Arrington make that kind of an impact in Wash.

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

LaVarr looks funny. Like he is HEAVILY Roided up.

He HATES the Cowboys.
He loved slamming Aikman. That bothers me more than TO on th star.

Never really much of chance to be on our team.

no biggie...

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

Easily Arrington.

Owens is a better player but that isn't the question.

Arrington improves the Giants' defense more than Owens improves the Cowboys' offense. Regardless of whether he makes more than his fair share of bad plays, opponent's OCs still have to account for him on every play. If the Giants' secondary holds up, they'll have a dominant defense, I can't say the same about the Cowboys' offense despite adding Owens.




**Edit** Sorry, put this in the wrong thread. It goes in the Arrington/Owens Poll.

I will agree that he really helps the giants because he is with Strahan and Osi Usi whatever his name... but it is because of those 2 players that he will be good.

TO comes in and has potential to blow away defenses singlehandedly...

 

[Funxva]

God, trust me we didn't want this guy.

After seeing him and Clinton "i like wimenz clothing" Portis in those Eastern Car commercials, I knew they should have married eachother.

 

[Chief]

Thomas Henderson is the patriarch of No. 56.

Lawrence Taylor chose the number because of Henderson.

 

[Paniolo22]

Easily Arrington.

Owens is a better player but that isn't the question.

Arrington improves the Giants' defense more than Owens improves the Cowboys' offense. Regardless of whether he makes more than his fair share of bad plays, opponent's OCs still have to account for him on every play.

Really? I guess opposing defenses only have to worry about Owens on....uh...I guess only on plays that he is in the game.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

He wore 56 because in college he was 11 and they would not let him wear that number in the NFL so he went to 56 because he can just imangine a plus in between.
he said on NFL network that he wants to be knick named nickles for his new number 55

you can't give yourself a nickname, what an idiot

 

[Cowboy Junkie]

He was on NFL Network last night begging for them to call him nickles , if it wasn't so sad it would have been quite funny, what am I saying it was hilarious

 

[Cowboy Junkie]

you can't give yourself a nickname, what an idiot

He was unbelievable , like I said in a post earlier he was just like Leon from the Beer commercials where this Leon character played MLB baseball and had many errors and struck out all the time but he talked how great he was and if his team did not need him carrying them then he would not make all those mistakes ( could not remember exactly how they went but somthing like that ).
Commercials are very funny but I thought they were fiction and now I am thinking they are based on actual Lavar events

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Easily Arrington.

Owens is a better player but that isn't the question.

Arrington improves the Giants' defense more than Owens improves the Cowboys' offense. Regardless of whether he makes more than his fair share of bad plays, opponent's OCs still have to account for him on every play. If the Giants' secondary holds up, they'll have a dominant defense, I can't say the same about the Cowboys' offense despite adding Owens.




**Edit** Sorry, put this in the wrong thread. It goes in the Arrington/Owens Poll.

same thing can be said for Owens, he receives double coverage, where teams will roll a S to his side, thus opening up the middle for Witten, and his prescence helps open up running lanes, plus Owens is hard to tackle in the open field, and gets seperation quickly against man-coverage, fixing a big problem area for us last year