That is not a good example you are setting.Hope he doesn't change his game. If I were rich, I'd tell him, keep playing as you are, I'll take care of the fines.
Umm I think we all expected the NFL front office to come knocking after that hit. He demolished another NFL Star player. Just pay it....it was a helmet to helmet and he did launch. Jerry...write a check.
I was wondering that same thing.Any fine for yanking Dak's facemask non-call?
lol, that would be a tough little RB right there.So what did Kamara lead with, his balls?
No, he put his head down cause he didn't want his balls to become part of his head. lol
It’s standard for first offense.
https://operations.nfl.com/football-ops/nfl-rules-enforcement/fines-appeals/
That's just idiotic. People who hit with the head and go for the head are just lazy tacklers who want the big hit rather than make a tackle. That was not how the game was designed to be played. What is dumb is that players don't have enough sense not to do it and it has to be part of the rules!
LMAOShould a just picked him up and stuffed him in a Kettle. That would only have been like 15K.............
Do You recall that #99 Jets player Mark 'Gaustenu'( m.s.) the "spearing bass turd" Champion of the League awhile back?,,, his STYLE was obviously intentional,,,but,,, this namby-pamby B.S. helmet 2 helmet contact is an inherent ( perhaps unfortunately) nature of the frickin' game,,,That's just idiotic. People who hit with the head and go for the head are just lazy tacklers who want the big hit rather than make a tackle. That was not how the game was designed to be played. What is dumb is that players don't have enough sense not to do it and it has to be part of the rules!
Or having a civil tone and not acting like a ****OR, seeing that you are already on the internet, you could take 30 seconds to inform yourself instead making ridiculously wild untrue statements. But I guess that would be asking too much of a person on the internet...
Got it. I believe the explanation comes from the statement at the bottom saying fines will increase 5% each year starting in 2012. So they took the fine amounts beginning in 2011 and started tacking on 5% each year. It is believed the NFL skipped year(s) and didn’t tack on the 5% increase, but that is why there is a specific amount. It is based on 2011 fine schedules and 5% increases added to those over the years.But it doesn't explain the overly precise amount for the standard.
Hobby horse of mine - fines should be scaled to cap hit, not an absolute amount. The range of cap hit is almost 100 times from bottom to top. Fines mean relatively nothing to the top paid players in the league, while they can mean a lot to the guys at the bottom