Let Dak walk

Status
Not open for further replies.
The offense did and yes, Dak has his share of fumbles and interceptions prior to getting hurt. I'm sorry but are we operating under some delusion that Dak Prescott plays in a vacuum and anything he does is somehow not his fault?
But you specifically said Prescott turned it over 3 times per game. That's quite the stretch. It's not even in the vicinity of truth. You can say he had a horrible performance from time to time and be taken remotely serious.

It's telling how far some people will go to try and take a dump on Prescott. It's OK to not be a huge fan of a player, but the caliber of player he is just makes statements like that look really ignorant.
 
The offense did and yes, Dak has his share of fumbles and interceptions prior to getting hurt. I'm sorry but are we operating under some delusion that Dak Prescott plays in a vacuum and anything he does is somehow not his fault?
Not at all. But Dak wasn’t turning over the ball 3 times a game like you said. And even if he was. If the defence was getting 3 of their own. Would that not have helped the offense? I’m simply saying. Dak wasn’t turning the ball over 3 times a game.

also. The reason we have to hope for a Washington loss is because Dalton couldn’t get it done against them and was turning the ball over. So what is your point? Lol
 
But you specifically said Prescott turned it over 3 times per game. That's quite the stretch. It's not even in the vicinity of truth. You can say he had a horrible performance from time to time and be taken remotely serious.

It's telling how far some people will go to try and take a dump on Prescott. It's OK to not be a huge fan of a player, but the caliber of player he is just makes statements like that look really ignorant.

Well if I did, I'm sorry - let me rephrase that - the offense was turning the ball over 3 times. better?
 
Well if I did, I'm sorry - let me rephrase that - the offense was turning the ball over 3 times. better?
Not really, I mean there were a couple of games that were pretty sloppy, but your numbers are WAY off. Doubled actually.
We have a team total of 25 turnovers. That's an average of less than 2 turnovers per game (1.6).
Do you want to re-rephrase?
It's one thing to be critical, nothing wrong with that. But when you pull things straight out of your *** it just looks like you're hating on a player to the degree you have to make things up.

It's weird that you're THAT much of a non-Prescott fan on a team you follow.
 
I doubt Jerruh let's Dak walk. Rumor has it that he already has several Brinks trucks in line. I'm gonna say Dak gates one if, if not the most lucrative contract in NFL history.
 
Jones snr and jnr will pay Dak. Cowboys will continue to flatter to deceive. Jones snr and jnr will continue to sell their snake oil to the punters. Deja Vu.
I will continue to watch.
Better, well run teams will continue to outperform us.
 
Jones snr and jnr will pay Dak. Cowboys will continue to flatter to deceive. Jones snr and jnr will continue to sell their snake oil to the punters. Deja Vu.
I will continue to watch.
Better, well run teams will continue to outperform us.

If Dak is here we are winning at least one SB.
 
Not really, I mean there were a couple of games that were pretty sloppy, but your numbers are WAY off. Doubled actually.
We have a team total of 25 turnovers. That's an average of less than 2 turnovers per game (1.6).
Do you want to re-rephrase?
It's one thing to be critical, nothing wrong with that. But when you pull things straight out of your *** it just looks like you're hating on a player to the degree you have to make things up.

It's weird that you're THAT much of a non-Prescott fan on a team you follow.

So now we are going to include the games that Prescott wasn't under center to make him look good? Jesus you Dak Inquisition folks are hilarious. Every game the guy started the offense was turning the ball over at a healthy clip. Atlanta was a -3 in the turnover ration with 3 fumbles, Seattle was a -2 with 2 interceptions and again a -3 against Cleveland with 2 fumbles and an interception. That was all with the "I want 40 million dollars a year" guy leading the team. In fact this trend continued all the way to the Baltimore game where they had no turn overs and over the last 3 weeks against horrible teams they have managed to right the ship by winning the turnover battle in a huge way. So yea of course the turnover ration is going to drop. Doesn't take away from the fact that Prescott led offense was turning the ball over.
 
If Dak is here we are winning at least one SB.

I look at your posts and truly wonder if you are a fan of this team or a fan of Dak. If this team give Dak the contract I suspect they will, this team will win a few East titles in the short term and nothing else. A combination of the Jones boys and a huge QB contract ad infinitum is a recipe for mediocrity.
I will continue like I have for a large proportion of my adult life watch this groundhog day of ongoing anti climaxing.
Great.
 
If Dak is here we are winning at least one SB.

Yea they don't hand SB's for finishing 8-8 and generating hype. How about instead of the SB we try and beat a team with a winning record. Let's set the bar really really low for Dak because he seems to need all the help he can get to justify the insane salary he is demanding.
 
So now we are going to include the games that Prescott wasn't under center to make him look good? Jesus you Dak Inquisition folks are hilarious. Every game the guy started the offense was turning the ball over at a healthy clip. Atlanta was a -3 in the turnover ration with 3 fumbles, Seattle was a -2 with 2 interceptions and again a -3 against Cleveland with 2 fumbles and an interception. That was all with the "I want 40 million dollars a year" guy leading the team. In fact this trend continued all the way to the Baltimore game where they had no turn overs and over the last 3 weeks against horrible teams they have managed to right the ship by winning the turnover battle in a huge way. So yea of course the turnover ration is going to drop. Doesn't take away from the fact that Prescott led offense was turning the ball over.
Moving the goalposts? Didn't you just try and make a save by changing what you actually posted and then said you meant team?
 
id917932200
So now we are going to include the games that Prescott wasn't under center to make him look good? Jesus you Dak Inquisition folks are hilarious. Every game the guy started the offense was turning the ball over at a healthy clip. Atlanta was a -3 in the turnover ration with 3 fumbles, Seattle was a -2 with 2 interceptions and again a -3 against Cleveland with 2 fumbles and an interception. That was all with the "I want 40 million dollars a year" guy leading the team. In fact this trend continued all the way to the Baltimore game where they had no turn overs and over the last 3 weeks against horrible teams they have managed to right the ship by winning the turnover battle in a huge way. So yea of course the turnover ration is going to drop. Doesn't take away from the fact that Prescott led offense was turning the ball over.

LOL
 
Well if I did, I'm sorry - let me rephrase that - the offense was turning the ball over 3 times. better?

I love this...

"Yeah, but Romo was more worse than that...he was a choker. Romo turned the ball over more then Dak ever did. Dak never choked in a game and all Romo did was go sing in Hollywood and bang Jessica and he never was trying to help his team. Dak never parties, he learns football 24/7 389 times a year around the clock. If Dak had a good defense like the Bears back when he could win 4 or 6 Super Bowls. He was all most going to beat Peyton Manning's passing yards and Romo could not even beat Peyton Manning when they played because he choked and was a loser. If you haters out there, and you know who they are, if you don't like Dak, then you are a stupid moron and a hater and you don't know football, period, case closed."

(anonymous cowboy fan)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,056
Messages
14,509,487
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top