buybuydandavis
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,933
- Reaction score
- 21,898
Cobb and Beasley are a different style of player.
Cobb is built for bigger plays and has more run after catch abilities so his numbers should look better than Beasleys.
Beasley is much better at working small spaces and getting open quickly compared to Cobb but as a down the field threat Beasley can't touch Cobb.
Cobb can play all 3 WR positions. Beasley is limited to a slot guy that won't do much down field.
I think Beasley is better at what he does then Cobb but after you factor in the money that we paid then Cobb was obviously a better choice.
It's similar to Dak and Andy Dalton... Is Dak better? Sure.. But when you compare contracts vs what both provide there isn't a big enough difference in play to validate one over the other.
Beasley was just a poor fit for us.
Should be on a pass first offense where he can be a full time slot WR. Bad fit for a run/pass balance, as he can't block and isn't a threat deep, which is what you want from your WRs in run/pass balance - WRs who back defenders out of the box and off the LOS.
And no way should we have taken that contract. Good for Beasley cashing in. Good for Cobb too. Comp picks. Think win-win.
I'd say Beasley is the better player generally, but Cobb was probably better *for us*. And that's straight up ignoring the salary difference.

