Recommended Loss Forensics: Romo vs. the League's Top QB

[dragon_mikal]

Romo has has years of Romo friendly moves and he still can't get past 8/8.

What's a "Romo friendly" move?

And the Dallas Cowboys can't get past 8-8...not just Tony Romo.

Bah...I won't get pulled into this stupid discussion again.

 

[5Stars]

What makes someone look like a fool is continuing to tell posters you're putting them on ignore only to keep messaging them back. My argument isn't where GM's are ranking Romo my argument was most wouldn't have him ranked ahead of Eli and Roethlisberger.

lol....you cannot prove what any GM would say.

 

[5Stars]

What a neo Maxie zoon dweetie

Have you read it? Did I send it to you?

 

[gimmesix]

Romo has has years of Romo friendly moves and he still can't get past 8/8.

I'm sorry, but this is a really pitiful "I have nothing I can say" response.

If you can't see how Romo unfriendly this team has been, compared with the support Staubach and Aikman got, you are truly blind.

 

[Aurican]

I'm glad you responded to my question instead of pretending not to take it seriously. The KC loss was as much Romo's as anybody's, but over the last few years, that statement has obviously been the exception--not the rule.

It's good to have an open mind on the subject, we all have opinions but you can't have a discussion without listening to what the other side has to say.

It would be interesting to see real applications and examples of games where the defense has completely been to blame for the loss and Romo has played excellent. Which losses from the past season would you say were solely the defense"s fault and Romo played great?

 

[KJJ]

Including those that directly contradict your opinions but I don't see those stopping you from spouting your own biased opinions. Just because some don't agree with your takes it does not mean they are just some silly Homer who is not educated about the game. As I said earlier you are just as bad as those you lament.

My opinions aren't biased they're supported by facts and by those who get paid to talk football. Those who don't agree with me have a pro Romo bias. It's pretty obvious why I'm outnumbered here.

 

[justbob]

Just a shade to the left of on thread.Straighten it up boys or lose your license

 

[iceberg]

Have you read it? Did I send it to you?

Gonna pass on anything Mr Hugh ego has to say.

 

[5Stars]

I'm sorry, but this is a really pitiful "I have nothing I can say" response.

If you can't see how Romo unfriendly this team has been, compared with the support Staubach and Aikman got, you are truly blind.

Hey, birds of a feather flock together. He is another one that can only see Romo as to why the team has been 8-8. The other players on the team have done an OUTSTANDING job....except Romo.

 

[Apollo Creed]

It's good to have an open mind on the subject, we all have opinions but you can't have a discussion without listening to what the other side has to say.

It would be interesting to see real applications and examples of games where the defense has completely been to blame for the loss and Romo has played excellent. Which losses from the past season would you say were solely the defense"s fault and Romo played great?

Denver, Green Bay, Detroit.

Averaged 38 points a game in those losses.

 

[5Stars]

My opinions aren't biased they're supported by facts and by those who get paid to talk football. Those who don't agree with me have a pro Romo bias. It's pretty obvious why I'm outnumbered here.

lol Sometimes when someone tells you that your are drunk, it's really time to sit down.

 

[dragon_mikal]

It's good to have an open mind on the subject, we all have opinions but you can't have a discussion without listening to what the other side has to say.

It would be interesting to see real applications and examples of games where the defense has completely been to blame for the loss and Romo has played excellent. Which losses from the past season would you say were solely the defense"s fault and Romo played great?

Did you even watch this team last year?

 

[gimmesix]

It's pretty obvious why I'm outnumbered here.

This struck me as funny. Most of the time it's the insane person who thinks he's right and everyone else is crazy.

 

[WhizKid]

My opinions aren't biased they're supported by facts and by those who get paid to talk football. Those who don't agree with me have a pro Romo bias. It's pretty obvious why I'm outnumbered here.

Just link to your evidence and this conversation will come to an end. You say you did it a couple weeks ago in a different thread. Provide the link to that post so that you don't have to spend time rewriting it, since it has already been written. It's as simple as that! I'm curious and would like to look at your evidence as it just may be compelling, as you insist.

 

[KJJ]

Look up Big Ben and Eli's defenses the year they won Super Bowls.

The Cowboys and Romo shredded the Giants defense in both regular season games in 07. Romo tossed 8 TD passes in those games. Roethlisberger had the #1 D in 08 but his OL was horrible and he had no running game. Ben got sacked 48 times in 08 Romo would have never survived behind his OL. Cowboy FANS have used Romo's OL as an excuse many times for his failures. Roethlisbergers #1 D got shredded by Kurt Warner in the SB and it was Roethlisberger who had to lead his offense on a last ditch SB winning drive.

I obviously am a fool for thinking you could ever intelligently discuss football. Peace.

So what does that mean "back to ignore for me?" LOL!

 

[5Stars]

Did you even watch this team last year?

A last place defense in probably the History of the NFL and certainly the Cowboys, and he asks that question? lol

 

[iceberg]

Denver, Green Bay, Detroit.

Averaged 38 points a game in those losses.

Detroit, romo gets us a fg late in the game and our D only has to hang on for 1 minute.

Fold like a cheap suit but hey, we had 12 seconds to do it again.

Damn that romo.

 

[justbob]

Just a shade to the left of on thread.Straighten it up boys or lose your license

Maybe they didn't all see it or didn't understand... We will give them one more chance.

 

[KJJ]

Just link to your evidence and this conversation will come to an end. You say you did it a couple weeks ago in a different thread. Provide the link to that post so that you don't have to spend time rewriting it, since it has already been written. It's as simple as that! I'm curious and would like to look at your evidence as it just may be compelling, as you insist.

I don't have the link to that post they no longer have a search function but I can't believe some of you are arguing that a QB's TD to turnover ratio doesn't have a great impact in games especially in postseason. Like I said just look at the last 5 SB's and compare the TD to turnover ratio of the winning and losing QB. LOL

 

[Aurican]

Did you even watch this team last year?

I watched every game, let me guess you're going to tell me Romo was perfect and it was all the defense right?