kingwhicker
BCRSA
- Messages
- 3,290
- Reaction score
- 0
HeavyHitta31 said:That something is parody.
Or parity, but yes, the current NFL is a parody of what it once was.
HeavyHitta31 said:That something is parody.
HeavyHitta31 said:I am so sick of this watered down, pansy, go from 5-11 to SB champs in one year league. It just isnt the same. This game was so much more fun when every year you knew it was going to be Dallas or SF to win the title, or in the 70s you knew it would be Dallas or Pittsburgh. In the 80s, you knew it was going to be either the Commanders or 49ers. Now, every single team has at least a small shot going into every season.
I miss seeing teams that could go 3-4 deep at some positions and still have pro-bowl caliber players. I miss teams that had superstars at every position on the field. I miss players flocking to the teams with the best owners who were willing to shell out the big bucks. I miss players staying with one team for their entire career. I miss having to build your team through the draft and trades.
I just watched a SB in which both teams that played would not have finished above .500 in the pre-salary cap days. Hell, its been that way for years now. If the NFL knows whats best for it, It'll ditch the cap and never look back.
Cristoff said:There are more owners now willing to spend than when he first got in this game.
HeavyHitta31 said:I don't think you understand: Getting rid of the cap would also require getting rid of FA, otherwise its pointless to do. Reset the league back to 1994.
HeavyHitta31 said:Since the cap came into effect, only 1 SB, the 1996 game between Dallas and Pittsburgh, has gotton a higher network rating than 44. In contrast, in the 29 SBs before the cap, the SB rating broke 44 16 times.
Just to show how bad SB ratings have become, SB 5 in 1971, yes, 1971, had a network rating nearly 5 points higher than SB 39 in 2005. 5 points in network ratings = millions of viewers
Now, I'm not expert, but if a game in 1971, a time in which nearly a 4th of all households in this country didnt even own a television, can get higher ratings than a SB in 2005, a time in which 9 of every 10 households in this country own a televsion, something is wrong. That something is parody.
And the nfl would lose half of its fan base.HeavyHitta31 said:Chess is boring as Hell. I want 2-3 GREAT teams, 2-3 very good teams, and a whole lotta bad teams. Thats what the league was before the cap and FA: Several great/good teams that were dynasties and the rest who were trying to get there.
HeavyHitta31 said:Chess is boring as Hell. I want 2-3 GREAT teams, 2-3 very good teams, and a whole lotta bad teams. Thats what the league was before the cap and FA: Several great/good teams that were dynasties and the rest who were trying to get there.
Longboysfan said:Yeah. The NFC East Rules.
The way the league was going and the monies the players were getting were not close. This is why the players had a strike.
Unless there is some shape or form where the teams had to pay out a certain percentage of the GDR to the players you will have strikes. The players know that that owning an NFL franchise is like getting a license to print money. So they want their fair share.
Mr Cowboy said:Dropping the salary cap would ensure that the teams with good owners who have winning as a priority will always have a chance.
Teams like the Cardinals, Saints and Browns, who are in the NFL to collect a paycheck form the teams that acutually market their teams, will forever be losers. The cap has not really ensured that the losers will become winners.
Todays game is a prime example of how the cap has ruined the quality of today's NFL. The two teams in today's superbowl would have been battling for a top 5 draft pick in the early 90's. Two equally bad teams that allowed the referees to have a hand in the outcome.
HeavyHitta31 said:Anyone else not have a problem with this?
Tio said:And the nfl would lose half of its fan base.
Doomsday101 said:I think if your going to have FA then you must have a cap. If I had my way there would be no FA and no cap.
junk said:This is just fans pining for the old days when Dallas was one of the dynasties and they want it back.
Maybe Dallas should draft well before they worry about that. Salary cap or not, Dallas certainly wouldn't have had a dynasty lately.
NE seemed to have accomplished it in the salary cap era though....
HeavyHitta31 said:Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner. That's my whole point, go back to the league of old.
HeavyHitta31 said:We've already been through this, history proves ratings would go up, not down.
wileedog said:I don't think the ratings have anything to do with the quality of play.
Did more people really tune in because Dallas was a great team and spanked the Bills 52-17?
I think people are just tired of 2 weeks of inane hoopla leading up to the game, 4 more hours of more inane hoopla leading up to kick-off, and horrific train-wreck half-time shows. Most people just watch for the commericals now, and these are people who don't know an offsides penalty from an onside kick. The quality of play means nothing to them.
HeavyHitta31 said:These NE teams would have been lucky to make the playoffs in the pre-cap era.