So you would rather a mediocre DC pick the players to play in his mediocre defense?
Yeah, count me out on that. Fire Nolan, bring in a new DC and let him, the scouts, McClay give Jerry names to pick on defense.
He has coached different scheme. He coached a Cover 2 at K State before coming here under Ryan. I wouldn't classify him as a 3-4, 4-3 guy one way or the other
Meant Missouri not K State. He ran a Cover at MissouriI wouldn't classify him as a Ryan guy, to be honest. He has his own defensive scheme.
I am unsure of his "Cover 2 at K State" experience. I know that he coached at Toledo and at Missouri. I mean, if we want to go back to where his initial principles were influenced, it's probably Nick Saban, who he has ties to early on.
Meant Missouri not K State. He ran a Cover at Missouri
Yes, It's mediocre because of what he inherited.
Could he have done things better? Of course he could, but when you get a respected NFL voice like Michael Lombardi saying that Matt Eberflus(who people have been raving about all season) needs to change the way he is setting up his DEF in Indianapolis if he wants long-term success then that tells me the gap between success and failure is not that great and you obviously need both the players and the scheme for it to work.
Eberflus and the Colts may have the players, but does their scheme need to be tweaked for long-term success?
Nolan does not have the players and a scheme that cannot work to it's potential without them-I feel it is only right he is given that chance.
It's mediocre because, in part, Nolan is mediocre himself. You've convinced yourself that he's a really good DC being held back by talent issues but his history as a DC shows you that's an unwise bet to make. He also has no history of successfully building a great D. His best Ds in Baltimore? Built by Marvin Lewis.
Plus, I am not sure criticizing Eberflus makes sense. His defense is 8th in yards allow, 8th in DVOA and 10th in point allowed. It's hardly a bad or mediocre defense.
He ran a 4-3 cover 2 at MissouriYeah, but you can run Cover 2 out of a 43 or 34. That doesn't really suggest defensive ideology IMO.
Michael Lombardi on his podcast has been making the point all season that the Rod Marinelli DEF is not good enough in the NFL anymore. He makes the point that Matt Eberflus DEF is way to predictable (based on Marinelli's) and has been saying this all season and it has been found out. He credits Sean McVay in replacing Wade Phillips with a hybrid DEF that is good at 3 phases and not predictable (33% Zone 33% man, 33% Zone dogs).
Don't be great at just one thing, it will be found out.
Describes Eberflus as a 'one pitch fast ball scheme'
We need a hybrid scheme in Dallas that is further developed in the off season.
What happened this year is simple.....Nolans scheme and the personnel on this team are not compatible.
You have a Hybrid scheme and you have the worst defense in Cowboys history and one of the worst NFL history.Michael Lombardi on his podcast has been making the point all season that the Rod Marinelli DEF is not good enough in the NFL anymore. He makes the point that Matt Eberflus DEF is way to predictable (based on Marinelli's) and has been saying this all season and it has been found out. He credits Sean McVay in replacing Wade Phillips with a hybrid DEF that is good at 3 phases and not predictable (33% Zone 33% man, 33% Zone dogs).
Don't be great at just one thing, it will be found out.
Describes Eberflus as a 'one pitch fast ball scheme'
We need a hybrid scheme in Dallas that is further developed in the off season.
Someone a lot more qualified than myself is criticising Eberflus and pointing out further problems down the line when you are one dimensional on DEF.
Kris Richard was hailed as the next great DEF coach and that didn't come to much. It's not always that easy to strike gold when hiring but in my opinion one year of Nolan is not enough time to judge him with all the other factors.
He ran a 4-3 cover 2 at Missouri
Lombardi isn't exactly without fault. Lombardi once claimed Doug Pederson was essentially a fraud and had to very publicly apologize when Pederson won a SB. So he's hardly without mistakes.
Facts are facts. The Colts D is pretty good.
My point was crystal clear, and stated in the first sentence. Eberflus has coached different schemes.OK. I guess I don't understand where you are going here. I'm guessing it's the "34 guy" statement? Well, he was a 34 guy when Marinelli got here. But to your point, I agree, he has run different schemes, based on personnel. But in Indy, he doesn't run a Marinelli Defense. He doesn't use undersized DTs an try to create or funnel running attacks through penetration. He uses bigger bodies to protect his LBs and allows them to create and tackle. It's basically the exact opposite of what Marinelli does with his scheme. That was really the point I was trying to get at. Lombardi, in my opinion, doesn't know what he is talking about. He is trying to link the two by saying Eberflus is from the Marinelli tree, which really isn't true. He does his own thing.
My point was crystal clear, and stated in the first sentence. Eberflus has coached different schemes.
Any unintended way you wanted to read that is entirely on you
I'd like to eventually go multiple but Lombardi is a multiple time failed exec for a reason.Michael Lombardi on his podcast has been making the point all season that the Rod Marinelli DEF is not good enough in the NFL anymore. He makes the point that Matt Eberflus DEF is way to predictable (based on Marinelli's) and has been saying this all season and it has been found out. He credits Sean McVay in replacing Wade Phillips with a hybrid DEF that is good at 3 phases and not predictable (33% Zone 33% man, 33% Zone dogs).
Don't be great at just one thing, it will be found out.
Describes Eberflus as a 'one pitch fast ball scheme'
We need a hybrid scheme in Dallas that is further developed in the off season.