tyke1doe;3163074 said:
So who are better experts? Arm-chair fans who've never played football on an NFL level?
Exactly.
I agree that football players in general should make better experts than the average joe that watches football. The problem with that is that it's a false generalization. Just because the guy played and was great, doesn't make him great at analyzing it. Not all great players make great coaches or great GM's.
The problem with these networks is they rush out to hire the great players as soon as they retire and hope they help their ratings. Look at guys like Faulk, Emmitt, Gannon, etc. Being a star doesn't equate to knowing the game or the English language for that matter. Some of the better experts weren't stars: Solomon Wilcotts, Collinsworth (though he was good, but he also has a JD which shows he's intelligent), Millen, Green, etc. My favorite color guy is Dan Fouts, so that shows that stars can be good analyst. But you have to also be educated, something Faulk appears to be lacking. I'm sure he has a degree, but to say what he said proves his common sense is very low.