windward
NFL Historian
- Messages
- 18,689
- Reaction score
- 4,541
And Tony only got 26 and 20, you convinced me, Weeden is better!!!!
Please show me where I said Weeden was better than Romo.
And Tony only got 26 and 20, you convinced me, Weeden is better!!!!
Please show me where I said Weeden was better than Romo.
Last night a 40 year old Matt Hasselback led the colts to a victory. The second in four days. Matt spent one day in the hospital for a bacteria infection and was bed ridden for two days on a short week ( thurs night game). There are some who ask " what do you expect from a back up QB?" when discussing Weedens play. Well, i expect this type of performance.
Drew Brees plays defense?
I was teasing my friend!
Last night a 40 year old Matt Hasselback led the colts to a victory. The second in four days. Matt spent one day in the hospital for a bacteria infection and was bed ridden for two days on a short week ( thurs night game). There are some who ask " what do you expect from a back up QB?" when discussing Weedens play. Well, i expect this type of performance.
Yep this didn't take long for someone to take the bait and post this nonsense. Hasselbeck and the Colts are facing two of the worst teams in football and two teams with absolutely no offense and no good QB play. There's a big difference between facing the Falcons and then facing Drew Brees as opposed to Brian Hoyer and Blake Bortles. Not mention the fact that the Colts got extremely lucky to beat Jacksonville needing J'ville's FG kicker to miss 2 FG's , one at the end of regulation and one in OT, otherwise the Colts don't win that game.
Not to start this all up again, but we're really not losing games because of Brandon Weeden. Hist 91 yard drive in NOLA was pretty impressive in its own right.
Not disputing the claim that Matt is better than Brandon, but I do not share the backup envy considering we barely beat the Giants and Eagles with Romo at the help. The problems with the team are more systematic -- inconsistent OL, injuries, and poor defense. We should have been able to beat the Saints with the game Weeden had.
you ever watch the muppets and the two old guys up in the balcony, waldorf and statler, their routine "hey that wasnt half bad" "yea, wasnt that good either" Thats Weeden.. For everything you can use to defend him, other people can say "yes, but heres this".
Let's be honest here. Weeden have no business being on this team. At our state we need a proven veteran back up that know his role. Not a flunky that we hope can put stuff together once he play with our weapons. That is why I wanted Vince Young , Michael Vick or Schaub. Guys who proved they can win at this level. Not a Matt Cassell or Matt Flyn who couldn't do jack but bounce around to teams every off season.
We played an 0-3 saints team w drew brees w a bad throwing shoulder. He went to dr andrews and was confirmed to have structural damage to the rotator cuff. That team is just as bad as Houston.
Well then he is only going through what Romo does. There are many who consistently find fault in Tony Romo. For every good thing some will say there are others who will find the negative.
He played the Texans and Jaguars. A bit different from playing an undefeated Falcons team and Drew Brees.
Rightly so. I have backed Romo up since before many did. Does that mean Romo is not without critique, only in my mind but not in reality. Does that mean its right or wrong, clearly not. People are going to hate Romo because he wears teh number 9.
The BIG difference is, Romo is a QB who should be signed, Weeden should only be signed if you have no one left, in the league.