Matt Weletzko

xwalker said:
Rosenthal would have been a good udfa signing.

He has similarities to Weletzko but not to Tyler Smith.
Click to expand...

Yeah, after looking into the players, I think we're better off with Waletzko. Maybe Rosenthal could pan out, but he looks flabby and I think NFL is going to test his game.

Waletzko has a super high RAS, which I like, because we're trying to be the more athletic team on offense and defense. So, I just didn't have enough time to properly evaluate, since I kinda came in late this year. So I gotta give it to the Cowboys for doing their homework.

It's hard to guess the late round picks anyway. I also wasn't paying much attention to the Cowboys 30 visits.

Lesson learned.

I actually like Ball better than Waletzko, right now. Although that could change depending on how he plays.
 
From what is thrown around the plan is for this Giant of a tackle to be # 77’s insurance plan . Looks like he may get some prime time action
 
starfrombirth said:
Something wrong with Steele? He did very well last year at RT. Not so much LT but he was good at RT.
Click to expand...
Depends on Steele's continued growth, if he plateaus he will be due up a new contract at the end of the year I believe, if you have a prospect that is equal to you let Steele walk and backfill with either, Ball, Waletzko, FA (LOL) or another candidate.
 
If Steele shuts down the edge from the right side plays a full season without injury or failing the bathroom experiment like Collins ….I say reward him give a contract . One less position to fill .
 
RonWashington said:
If Steele shuts down the edge from the right side plays a full season without injury or failing the bathroom experiment like Collins ….I say reward him give a contract . One less position to fill .
Click to expand...
I disagree. Unless he is pro bowler then yes. if he is above average and the other guys are at or just below him you let him walk. You really should not be extending average to slightly above average talent. You need to manage the cap and churning guys like Steele if they do not continue to develop is key. Its awesome what he has accomplished as a UDFA but unless he is prow bowl or All-pro he should be considered replaceable.
 
jrumann59 said:
I disagree. Unless he is pro bowler then yes. if he is above average and the other guys are at or just below him you let him walk. You really should not be extending average to slightly above average talent. You need to manage the cap and churning guys like Steele if they do not continue to develop is key. Its awesome what he has accomplished as a UDFA but unless he is prow bowl or All-pro he should be considered replaceable.
Click to expand...

I won't be surprised if Ball takes his spot.
 
jrumann59 said:
I disagree. Unless he is pro bowler then yes. if he is above average and the other guys are at or just below him you let him walk. You really should not be extending average to slightly above average talent. You need to manage the cap and churning guys like Steele if they do not continue to develop is key. Its awesome what he has accomplished as a UDFA but unless he is prow bowl or All-pro he should be considered replaceable.
Click to expand...


Ok let’s have a revolving door at tackle with a 140 million $ QB ….especially with 77 on the other side of his career you would be looking at both tackles open . I’m not suggesting breaking the bank for Steele but if he continues to progress a sensible contract might be worked .
 
His upside is Doug Free who was a similar player coming out. I don't hold my breath on these guys that need to get stronger.
 
RonWashington said:
Ok let’s have a revolving door at tackle with a 140 million $ QB ….especially with 77 on the other side of his career you would be looking at both tackles open . I’m not suggesting breaking the bank for Steele but if he continues to progress a sensible contract might be worked .
Click to expand...
I understand the sentiment but because we have 140m on QB and have so many holes else where and smith may retire soon, martin has a few more years as well. Keep drafting well and spackle holes on the OL, if Steele is playing pro bowl caliber of course sign him but if not there are plenty of candidates to look at. Honestly I see steele getting to the doug free level of play, good but not spectacular and he will have you howling at the TV some weeks.
 
jrumann59 said:
I understand the sentiment but because we have 140m on QB and have so many holes else where and smith may retire soon, martin has a few more years as well. Keep drafting well and spackle holes on the OL, if Steele is playing pro bowl caliber of course sign him but if not there are plenty of candidates to look at. Honestly I see steele getting to the doug free level of play, good but not spectacular and he will have you howling at the TV some weeks.
Click to expand...


Doug Free was a solid part of a very dominant OLine . I guess first of all Steele has to win the job in camp fending off Josh Ball and if Steele is steady and serviceable like Doug Free I’m all in on say 2 yrs 7 mill .
 
Pass2Run said:
I won't be surprised if Ball takes his spot.
Click to expand...


He had quite the hype post draft and I guess a high ankle sprain kept him gone all year. Not even sure he played that last game regular season exhibition in Philly , a lot of backups got snaps that night .
 
Cowboyny said:
We are in transition at the position, Collins is already gone and Tyron probably play another 1-2 seasons. We now have Steele who will be a fa after the season, Ball, Wel and Tyler Smith. Let's hope our long-term starters at the position are already on the roster.
Click to expand...
Restricted Free Agent.
 
RonWashington said:
He had quite the hype post draft and I guess a high ankle sprain kept him gone all year. Not even sure he played that last game regular season exhibition in Philly , a lot of backups got snaps that night .
Click to expand...

I had almost forgotten about him. But he helps me feel better about the overall state of the offensive line because he adds competition and depth.
 
Pass2Run said:
Yeah, after looking into the players, I think we're better off with Waletzko. Maybe Rosenthal could pan out, but he looks flabby and I think NFL is going to test his game.

Waletzko has a super high RAS, which I like, because we're trying to be the more athletic team on offense and defense. So, I just didn't have enough time to properly evaluate, since I kinda came in late this year. So I gotta give it to the Cowboys for doing their homework.

It's hard to guess the late round picks anyway. I also wasn't paying much attention to the Cowboys 30 visits.

Lesson learned.

I actually like Ball better than Waletzko, right now. Although that could change depending on how he plays.
Click to expand...
Wally has a higher upside, just isn't ready.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 657 (members: 77, guests: 580)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,483
Messages
13,878,006
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top