One QB is coming back from a career year while the other one is coming back from a gruesome injury.
Dak had his a career year the year before and started out hot ie an even better year stat wise until his injurys so no sorry there no real difference ,.,.you say gruesome docs and dak himself said was pretty straight forward surgery with no setbacks and recovery on time..
NEWSFLASH
this is sports its the NFL,
players get hurt recover and back on track with ridiculous medical technology..20years ago an Achilles or acl would end careers..not now..get passed it ..Watson is not really better they are pretty much the same player outside of Watson takes far more chances getting harder hits..Daks was a fluke, tackle weird angle foot got caught..hes not injurys prone..
BTW like McCoy's injury the DC will have insurance built into the contract should the same injurys reoccur and cost dak and the DC a year onIR.. they arent stuid they know how to structure contracts with insurance involved..
dont get me wrong i like watson but no way hes worth Dak and our 10th over and im betting the texans after seeing what Stafford got wants more..
im 100% OUITTTTTTTT! at that cost..
the right move is to keep dak find happy medium for contract and get it done,,
only player i believe worth trade lie that that makes us immediately better is AAron Rogers you know the MVP in the B2B NFCCGs that is far better then dak or Watson..
id give them dak, 10th and next years 2nd..book that..