McFadden is pure class

CowboyRoy

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Wonderboyromo said:
he was raised by a literal crackhead. he could be much, much worse.
is there a rule that players have to be "overly welcoming" in a tweet? what if he texted Zeke? Called him? getting even a little miffed at a TWEET that said nothing bad whatsoever is just stupid.
Click to expand...

Not miffed at all. Whatever that means. Just pointing out that it was another stupid Dez move. At least the tweet sounded stupid. Maybe dumb@#$$ dez should get a brain and stop tweeting. But of course he is too stupid to do that.
 
Clarkson

Clarkson

Wonderboyromo
Messages
2,677
Reaction score
1,599
CowboyRoy said:
Not miffed at all. Whatever that means. Just pointing out that it was another stupid Dez move. At least the tweet sounded stupid. Maybe dumb@#$$ dez should get a brain and stop tweeting. But of course he is too stupid to do that.
Click to expand...

...how was it a stupid tweet? your posts right now are wayyy dumber.
 
Nightman

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Morris has guaranteed money and DMC doesn't

We don't need 3 similar RBs......DMC has to go in favor or Dunbar or Dunbar-type...

wasting 2m on DMC would be a terrible use of resources......Elliott is here for next 6 years.....
 
bayeslife

bayeslife

187beatdown
Messages
9,461
Reaction score
8,584
Risen Star said:
Disagree. McFadden is the more natural 3rd down/change of pace back. Morris is a better runner between the tackles but that's it. He also is not the kind of back who can produce with few touches. To me, Elliott phased out Morris not McFadden.

Here's the thing though. We've got Ezekiel Elliott now. We should be a one back offense and quit worrying about these ham and eggers. They can play a snap or two when Zeke needs a drink and a breather.
Click to expand...

Elliot is a better receiver than Dunbar and a better runner than Murray IMO. No reason he shouldn't be getting most of the touches.
 
YosemiteSam

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Risen Star said:
Disagree. McFadden is the more natural 3rd down/change of pace back. Morris is a better runner between the tackles but that's it. He also is not the kind of back who can produce with few touches. To me, Elliott phased out Morris not McFadden.

Here's the thing though. We've got Ezekiel Elliott now. We should be a one back offense and quit worrying about these ham and eggers. They can play a snap or two when Zeke needs a drink and a breather.
Click to expand...

I agree with this and is a big reason I was not a McFadden fan coming out of college. He always had trouble breaking tackles and staying on his feet. This makes running between the tackles less fruitful for him. His biggest asset was his speed. In college everyone sucks so big holes were common and he had huge yardage. That isn't the case in the NFL. This is why I offered in another thread where someone wanted to trade to the 32nd pick and keep the 34th pick. I said maybe you can bundle Leary and Morris with a much lower pick to get there. (they were offering the 4th round pick)
 
YosemiteSam

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
bkight13 said:
Morris has guaranteed money and DMC doesn't

We don't need 3 similar RBs......DMC has to go in favor or Dunbar or Dunbar-type...

wasting 2m on DMC would be a terrible use of resources......Elliott is here for next 6 years.....
Click to expand...

Elliot and Morris are more similar than Elliot and DMC.
 
Nightman

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Sam I Am said:
Elliot and Morris are more similar than Elliot and DMC.
Click to expand...

Exactly....Morris is the pure back-up.....DMC is redundant and cutting him saves 2m...get a late draft pick or UDFA to change pace and play STs.....
 
cowboys2233

cowboys2233

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,712
Reaction score
1,983
BrassCowboy said:
I said the same thing, but I am really curious what Dunbar brings to the passing game. Last year before he got hurt, he was lighting it up as a receiver. Offense looked really good with Dunbar lining up as a wr. Other than that, fully agree. Just curious though
Click to expand...

I think it would be stupid to get rid of Dunbar, he is an offensive weapon that can be utilized in many different ways. Oh, we need to open a roster spot? Good, cut Street or Butler -- Dunbar adds more value to this team than a couple of random receivers who barely see the field and see the ball even less. I hate backup WRs, they are so worthless.
 
LocimusPrime

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
CowboyRoy said:
"lets see what happens"

Does that sound like something you would say to really welcome the guy that was just drafted? McFadden was a perfect example of how you would say it.
Click to expand...

That was an odd/ strange tweet.
 
Satchel89

Satchel89

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,632
Reaction score
1,747
I like the idea of McFadden playing a reserve role. He could be like Randle was a couple of years ago and that would obviously cut down the chances of him getting injured. I'm not saying he's the same back as he was 8 years ago but he's still got some left in the tank. You add Morris and that's a pretty good trio.
 
LittleBoyBlue

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
USMarineVet said:
At least for this season, I see DMac & Morris having value in 2 back sets. With Zeke's blocking ability he could lead block for either or simply take the hand off himself. Defenses will have to scheme for that and that could also open up passing lanes; especially in the red zone.
Click to expand...


Yup.

McFadden earned a 2nd year with Cowboys.

Slash and Gash!
 

KB1122

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,328
Reaction score
1,629
Who is the starter by the end of the year? I think it's 50-50.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top